Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38481669›Full record

ArticleBJUI compass2024

A study protocol of a comparative mixed study of the T-Control catheter.

José Medina-Polo, Ana Belén Salamanca-Castro, Yolanda Ramallo-Fariña, Max Mòdol-Vidal, Cristina Valcárcel-Nazco, Clara Armas-Moreno, Lilisbeth Perestelo-Pérez, Lidia García-Pérez, Miguel Ángel García-Bello, Manuel Luque-González and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJUI compass, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

José Medina-PoloUrology Service 12 de Octubre University Hospital Madrid Spain.
Ana Belén Salamanca-CastroUrology Service 12 de Octubre University Hospital Madrid Spain.
Yolanda Ramallo-FariñaCanary Islands Health Research Institute Foundation (FIISC), Evaluation Unit (SESCS) Canary Islands Health Service Tenerife Spain.
Max Mòdol-VidalScientific Department Rethink Medical SL Las Palmas de Gran Canaria Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-3534-2059
Cristina Valcárcel-NazcoCanary Islands Health Research Institute Foundation (FIISC), Evaluation Unit (SESCS) Canary Islands Health Service Tenerife Spain.
Clara Armas-MorenoScientific Department Rethink Medical SL Las Palmas de Gran Canaria Spain.
Lilisbeth Perestelo-PérezCanary Islands Research Group (Canary Islands Health Service) Network for Research on Chronicity, Primary Care, and Health Promotion (RICAPPS) Tenerife Spain.
Lidia García-PérezCanary Islands Health Research Institute Foundation (FIISC), Evaluation Unit (SESCS) Canary Islands Health Service Tenerife Spain.
Miguel Ángel García-BelloCanary Islands Health Research Institute Foundation (FIISC), Evaluation Unit (SESCS) Canary Islands Health Service Tenerife Spain.
Manuel Luque-GonzálezScientific Department Rethink Medical SL Las Palmas de Gran Canaria Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3764-119X
Marta Serrano-MuñozScientific Department Rethink Medical SL Las Palmas de Gran Canaria Spain.
Santiago Pérez-GarcíaInveCuid Group, Imas12 Institute 12 de Octubre University Hospital Madrid Spain.
Red de Investigación en Actividades Preventivas y Promoción de la Salud · ESResearch Institute Hospital 12 de Octubre · ESUniversidad de La Laguna · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Foley catheters have been subject to limited development in the last few decades. They fulfil their basic function of draining urine from the bladder but cause other associated problems. T-Control is a new silicone Foley catheter with an integrated fluid control valve whose design aims to reduce the risks associated with bladder catheterization by a multifactorial approach. The general purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness, comfort, and experience of the patient catheterized with T-Control® compared with patients with a conventional Foley catheter. Study Design: This trial is a mixed-method study comprising a two-arm, pilot comparative study with random allocation to T-Control catheter or traditional Foley catheter in patients with long-term catheterization and a study with qualitative methodology, through discussion groups. Endpoints: The comfort and acceptability of the T-Control® device (qualitative) and the quality of life related to self-perceived health (quantitative) will be analysed as primary endpoints. As secondary endpoints, the following will be analysed: magnitude and rate of infections (symptomatic and asymptomatic); days free of infection; indication of associated antibiotic treatments; determination of biofilm; number of catheter-related adverse events; use of each type of catheterization's healthcare resources; and level of satisfaction and workload of health professionals. Patients and Methods: Eligible patients are male and female adults aged ≥18 years, who require a change of long-term bladder catheter. The estimated sample size is 50 patients. Patient follow-up includes both the time of catheter insertion and its removal or change 4 weeks later, plus the time until the discussion groups take place.

Indexed as

CAUTIclinical trialFoley catheternursingquality of lifeurinary catheters

Identifiers

PMID38481669
PMCPMC10927921
OpenAlexW4390506456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.