ArticleMedical archives (Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina)2024
Survey of Using Oral Anticoagulants in Patient with Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation.
Article in Medical archives (Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In Vietnam, there has been no survey conducted on the prescribing and monitoring practices of oral anticoagulants to ensure that patients with atrial fibrillation receive appropriate. Objective: Therefore, we conducted this research to clarify the aforementioned issue in our hospital. Methods: We carried out a cross-sectional study by reviewing outpatient electronic medical records at the University Medical Center in Ho Chi Minh City. Our study included 1087 patients aged 18 years or older diagnosed with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), who visited the Cardiology clinic between January 1st, 2021, and June 30th, 2021. Results: Among the 1087 patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), 1036 were eligible for anticoagulant therapy. However, only 847 (81.8%) received prescriptions for either Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) (n=129, 15.2%) or Non-Vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) (n=718, 84.8%). NOAC prescriptions were more commonly found in patients aged 75 or older (adjusted odds ratio [OR]=2), those with health insurance coverage (adjusted OR=2.9), and in individuals with a history of hypertension (adjusted OR=2). On the contrary, patients with a farming occupation were less likely to be prescribed NOACs (adjusted OR=0.4). About 75% of patients adhered to the guidelines recommending close monitoring during anticoagulant treatment. Notably, inappropriate prescriptions were identified in 27.7% of cases, especially among those with no recorded body weight (which is necessary for precise dosing based on creatinine clearance), those without health insurance, those with undocumented CHA2DS2-VASc scores, or those who were concurrently using antiplatelet agents. Conclusion: A discrepancy persists between clinical guidelines and the actual practice in diagnosing and managing patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). It is crucial to prioritize the regular reevaluation of thromboembolic risk scores at follow-up appointments, ensure strict adherence to clinical monitoring standards, and align anticoagulant medication prescriptions with established guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.