ArticleISME communications2024
Total metagenomes outperform viromes in recovering viral diversity from sulfuric soils.
Article in ISME communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Empathi: embedding-based phage protein annotation tool by hierarchical assignment.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Unraveling the multiple interactions between phages, microbes and flavor in the fermentation of strong-flavor Baijiu.Bioresources and bioprocessing · 2025Article
- Biodiversity of mudflat intertidal viromes along the Chinese coasts.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Temporal turnover of viral biodiversity and functional potential in intertidal wetlands.NPJ biofilms and microbiomes · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent metagenomic advancements have offered unprecedented insights into soil viral ecology. However, it remains a challenge to select the suitable metagenomic method for investigating soil viruses under different environmental conditions. Here, we assessed the performance of viral size-fraction metagenomes (viromes) and total metagenomes in capturing viral diversity from hypersulfidic soils with neutral pH and sulfuric soils with pH <3.3. Viromes effectively enhanced the sequencing coverage of viral genomes in both soil types. Viomes of hypersulfidic soils outperformed total metagenomes by recovering a significantly higher number of viral operational taxonomic units (vOTUs). However, total metagenomes of sulfuric soils recovered ~4.5 times more vOTUs than viromes on average. Altogether, our findings suggest that the choice between viromes and total metagenomes for studying soil viruses should be carefully considered based on the specific environmental conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.