ArticleJournal of inflammation research2024
Machine Learning Predictive Model for Septic Shock in Acute Pancreatitis with Sepsis.
Article in Journal of inflammation research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Bar-Based Nomogram for Predicting Septic Shock in Patients with Acute Pancreatitis Complicated by Sepsis: Development and External Validation.Shock (Augusta, Ga.) · 2026Article
- Machine Learning-Based Prediction of 28-Day Mortality in Patients with Sepsis-Induced Cardiomyopathy: An Integrated Analysis of Inflammatory Biomarkers.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Article
- Utilizing machine learning models for predicting outcomes in acute pancreatitis: development and validation in three retrospective cohorts.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- Identification and mechanistic analysis of shared biomarkers and pathogenesis in acute pancreatitis and sepsis based on differential gene expression and protein interaction networks.Functional & integrative genomics · 2025Article
- AI and Machine Learning for Precision Medicine in Acute Pancreatitis: A Narrative Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- Minimally invasive step-up surgery demonstrates superior suitability over open surgery in severe acute pancreatitis.American journal of translational research · 2025Article
- Advances in the clinical application of machine learning in acute pancreatitis: a review.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Review
- Article
- Artificial intelligence-assisted phenotyping of sepsis: Research progress, clinical challenges, and translational prospects.Digital healthReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Acute pancreatitis (AP) progresses to septic shock can be fatal. Early identification of high-risk patients and timely intervention can prevent and interrupt septic shock. By analyzing the clinical characteristics of AP with sepsis, this study uses machine learning (ML) to build a model for early prediction of septic shock within 28 days of admission, which guided emergency physicians in resource allocation and medical decision-making. Methods: This retrospective cohort study collected data from the emergency departments (EDs) of three tertiary care hospitals in China. The dataset was randomly divided into a training dataset (70%) and a testing dataset (30%). Ten ML classifiers were utilized to analyze characteristics of AP with sepsis in the training dataset upon admission. Results were evaluated through cross-validation analysis. The optimal model was then tested on the testing dataset without any parameter modifications. The ML model was evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) and compared to scoring systems through the DeLong test. Results: A total of 604 AP patients with sepsis were included in this study. The auto-encoder (AE) model based on mean normalization, Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC), and recursive feature elimination (RFE) selection, achieved the highest Area Under the Curve (AUC) on the validation dataset (AUC 0.900, accuracy 0.868), with the AUC of 0.879 and accuracy of 0.790 on the testing dataset. Compared to the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (AUC 0.741), quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (AUC 0.727), Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (AUC 0.778), and Bedside Index of Severity in Acute Pancreatitis (AUC 0.691), the AE model showed superior performance. Conclusion: The AE model outperforms traditional scoring systems in predicting septic shock in AP patients with sepsis within 28 days of admission. This assists emergency physicians in identifying high-risk patients early and making timely medical decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.