Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38481407›Full record

ArticleArab journal of urology2024

Sixth edition of the World Health Organization laboratory manual of semen analysis: Updates and essential take away for busy clinicians.

Eric Chung, Widi Atmoko, Ramadan Saleh, Rupin Shah, Ashok Agarwal

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arab journal of urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 6 countries.

Eric ChungAndroUrology Centre, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3373-3668
Widi AtmokoGlobal Andrology Forum, Moreland Hills, OH, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7793-7083
Ramadan SalehGlobal Andrology Forum, Moreland Hills, OH, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0503-3533
Rupin ShahGlobal Andrology Forum, Moreland Hills, OH, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7868-5949
Ashok AgarwalGlobal Andrology Forum, Moreland Hills, OH, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0585-1026
Global Forum for Health Research · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Semen analysis is the cornerstone for male fertility evaluation. In 2021, the World Health Organization (WHO) released its 6 Methods: We highlight the main changes in the latest 6 Results: The manual is highly comprehensive, offering detailed information, and is widely regarded as an excellent technical reference for laboratory staff. Nevertheless, several aspects of the manual require further elucidation for infertility practitioners. Conclusion: The recently published 6th edition of the WHO manual provides a strong framework for the assessment and processing of human semen. Grasping the modifications introduced in this updated edition and their clinical significance can enhance the quality of patient care.

Indexed as

Male infertilitysemen analysisspermWHOWorld Health Organization

Identifiers

PMID38481407
PMCPMC10929669
OpenAlexW4390234235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.