ArticleJHEP reports : innovation in hepatology2024
Universal screening for HCV infection in China: An effectiveness and cost-effectiveness analysis.
Article in JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Universal HCV Screening in Hospitalised Patients in France: It Could Be a Good Option! The DEVICHO Study.Journal of viral hepatitis · 2025Trial
- Optimizing Hepatitis C Virus Antibody Testing Strategy and Setting: Results From a Large Real-World Screening Program.Open forum infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Sex-related differences in treatment outcomes of chronic hepatitis C with direct-acting antivirals.World journal of hepatology · 2025Article
- Cost-benefit analysis of universal screening for HCV infection in China: a Markov modelling study.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Sex-related differences in patients with chronic hepatitis C infection treated with direct-acting antiviral drugs.World journal of hepatology · 2025Article
- Prevalence of Hepatitis C in the Emilia-Romagna Region of Italy: Population-Wide Screening.Viruses · 2025Article
- Age-period-cohort and bayesian age-period-cohort prediction modeling of hepatitis C incidence and mortality in China.BMC public health · 2025Article
- The macroeconomic burden of hepatitis C and the economic benefit of accelerated investments in China.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Cost-Effectiveness of Screening and Treating Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Infection in Zimbabwe.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
- Self-testing strategy to eliminate hepatitis C as per World Health Organization's goal: Analysis of disease burden and cost-effectiveness.Clinical and molecular hepatology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background & Aims: Approximately 10 million people live with chronic HCV infection in China, and less than 20% of people with HCV were diagnosed. We aim to determine the cost-effectiveness of one-time HCV screening compared with no screening in the Chinese population from the healthcare system perspective. Methods: A decision-tree plus Markov model was adopted to project chronic hepatitis C (CHC) prevalence, probability of complications, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and costs in the Chinese general population undiagnosed for CHC for different screening strategies. Once CHC was diagnosed, pan-genotypic direct-acting antiviral agent treatment was administered regardless of fibrosis. The population was simulated in a model spanning a lifetime. Input parameters were obtained from published literature. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio between screening and no screening was estimated. The one-time Chinese gross domestic product per capita in 2021 ($12,558/QALY) was used as the willingness-to-pay threshold. Results: Universal screening in the population aged 3-80 years led to the lowest probability of complications, which yielded a 62% reduction of excess mortality. Compared with no screening, implementing screening and treatment for HCV in populations aged 3-80 years resulted in the greatest marginal QALYs (15.2 per 1,000 population) with an increase in total costs of $109,136. Calculating the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio yields a value of $9,503/QALY (95% uncertainty interval $3,738-$22,566). The robustness of the model was demonstrated through various sensitivity analyses. If the CHC prevalence was over 0.3%, screening could be cost-effective. Conclusions: HCV screening for Chinese people aged 3-80 years may be a cost-effective intervention to reduce the disease burden related to HCV infection. This strategy should certainly be implemented. Impact and implications: This study found that screening Chinese people aged 3-80 years yielded the greatest health benefits and was a cost-effective alternative. The findings indicated that national efforts eliminating HCV should be invested and strengthened in China. The results of this study are important because they provide strong evidence that universal screening can be a cost-effective way to reduce the burden of HCV in China. These findings are important for policymakers, physicians, patients, caregivers, and the public because they promote awareness and inform decision-making for HCV prevention and treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.