Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38481384›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2024

Accessing care for Long Covid from the perspectives of patients and healthcare practitioners: A qualitative study.

Fidan Turk, Jennifer Sweetman, Carolyn A Chew-Graham, Mark Gabbay, Jessie Shepherd, Christina van der Feltz-Cornelis, STIMULATE-ICP Consortium

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Patient and Professional Perspectives on Long COVID: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Synthesis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Barriers to Long COVID Care in the U.S.: An Application of Levesque et al.'s Access Framework.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. 'What Do People With Long Covid Want From Healthcare Services?' A Qualitative Exploration From Lived Experience.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. PCE-CfD and Long Covid: An NHS Service Evaluation on the Benefits of Using Person-Centred Experiential Counselling for Depression With People With Long Covid.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Living With Persistent Respiratory Symptoms of Long COVID: Qualitative Study Among Brazilian Adults 12 Months After Acute Infection.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  19. 'The Second Arrow': A Collaborative Autoethnographic Exploration of What Can Be Learned From One Long COVID Journey.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  20. Internet interventions · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Fidan TurkDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1487-318X
Jennifer SweetmanDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1969-4586
Carolyn A Chew-GrahamSchool of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9722-9981
Mark GabbayDepartment of Primary Care and Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0126-8485
Jessie ShepherdDepartment of Education, University of York, York, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8373-3706
Christina van der Feltz-CornelisDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6925-8956
STIMULATE-ICP Consortium

Funding

NIHR COV-LT2-0043
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLong Covid is an emerging long-term condition, with those affected raising concerns about lack of healthcare support.

objectiveWe conducted a qualitative study to identify facilitators and barriers to healthcare access for people with Long Covid, aiming to enhance our understanding of the specific nature of these barriers and how patient experiences may vary. SETTING AND

participantsIn the context of the Symptoms, Trajectory, Inequalities and Management: Understanding Long-COVID to Address and Transform Existing Integrated Care Pathways (STIMULATE-ICP) Delphi study, a nationally distributed online survey was conducted. Eight patients and eight healthcare practitioners (HCP) were interviewed via telephone or video call. Framework analysis, sensitised by the candidacy theory, was used to identify barriers and facilitators over four levels of access to care.

resultsThree themes were identified: (i) patients' efforts to navigate emerging pathways for Long Covid, (ii) the patient-HCP interaction and (iii) service resources and structural constraints. Barriers to specialist care included long waiting times, communication gaps across services and a lack of continuity in care. Facilitators included collaborative, patient-centred approaches, patients' active role in their healthcare and blended approaches for appointments. The perspectives of both patients and HCPs largely aligned. DISCUSSION: The candidacy framework was valuable in understanding the experiences of people with Long Covid seeking access to healthcare. Individuals perceived themselves as eligible for care, but they often encountered obstacles in obtaining the expected level of care or, in some cases, did not receive it at all. Our findings are discussed in the context of the candidacy model through multiple processes of identification, negotiation, permeability and appearances at health services. These themes seem to be especially important for the emerging new pathway model and are relevant to both primary and secondary care.

conclusionsThis study highlights that despite these interviews being conducted two years after the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, people with Long Covid still struggle to access healthcare, emphasising the ongoing need to provide equitable timely healthcare access for people with Long Covid. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: People with Long Covid advised on all stages of this research.

Indexed as

COVID-19Post-Acute COVID-19 SyndromeHealth ServicesHealth Services AccessibilityHumansPandemicsQualitative Researchaccess to carelived experiencesLong Covidlong-term conditionsmultiple symptomsqualitative studywaiting times

Identifiers

PMID38481384
PMCPMC10938067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.