Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38481327›Full record

ArticleAlgorithms for molecular biology : AMB2024

Median quartet tree search algorithms using optimal subtree prune and regraft.

Shayesteh Arasti, Siavash Mirarab

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Algorithms for molecular biology : AMB, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shayesteh ArastiComputer Science and Engineering Department, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA.
Siavash MirarabElectrical and Computer Engineering Department, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA. smirarab@ucsd.edu.

Funding

Biology-aware machine learning methods for characterizing microbiome genotype and phenotypeR35GM142725 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI MIR ARABBAYGI, SIAVASH · 2021 to 2025
$1.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM142725NIH HHS 1R35GM142725
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene trees can be different from the species tree due to biological processes and inference errors. One way to obtain a species tree is to find one that maximizes some measure of similarity to a set of gene trees. The number of shared quartets between a potential species tree and gene trees provides a statistically justifiable score; if maximized properly, it could result in a statistically consistent estimator of the species tree under several statistical models of discordance. However, finding the median quartet score tree, one that maximizes this score, is NP-Hard, motivating several existing heuristic algorithms. These heuristics do not follow the hill-climbing paradigm used extensively in phylogenetics. In this paper, we make theoretical contributions that enable an efficient hill-climbing approach. Specifically, we show that a subtree of size m can be placed optimally on a tree of size n in quasi-linear time with respect to n and (almost) independently of m. This result enables us to perform subtree prune and regraft (SPR) rearrangements as part of a hill-climbing search. We show that this approach can slightly improve upon the results of widely-used methods such as ASTRAL in terms of the optimization score but not necessarily accuracy.

Indexed as

ASTRALGene tree discordancePhylogeneticsQuartet distanceQuartet scoreSubtree prune and regraftTree search

Identifiers

PMID38481327
PMCPMC10938725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.