Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38481323›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2024

Clinical reasoning skill of nurses working in teaching medical centers in dealing with practical scenarios of King's model concepts.

Seyyed Reza Borzo, Fatemeh Cheraghi, Mahnaz Khatibian, Marzieh Jahani Sayad Noveiri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Seyyed Reza BorzoDepartment of Medical Surgical Nursing, Chronic Disease (Home Care) Research Center, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Hamadan University of Medical Science, Hamadan, Iran.
Fatemeh CheraghiDepartment of Pediatric Nursing, Chronic Disease (Home Care) Research Center, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Hamadan University of Medical Science, Hamadan, Iran.
Mahnaz KhatibianDepartment of Medical Surgical Nursing, Maternal and Child Care Research Center, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Hamadan University of Medical Science, Hamadan, Iran.
Marzieh Jahani Sayad NoveiriDepartment of Medical Surgery, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran. jahanimzh@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2864-3003

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe present study was conducted to determine clinical reasoning of nurses working in teaching medical centers in dealing with practical scenarios of King's concepts.

methodsThe study population in this cross-sectional descriptive-analytical study comprised 133 nurses. Data were collected using scenarios based on the King's model. Data were analyzed in SPSS-16.

findingsMean age of the participating nurses was 27.71 ± 8.1 years.The clinical reasoning score was less than average in most participating nurses, and had a significant relationship with education(P < 0.05), service ward(P < 0.001)and organizational position(P < 0.05). In the multivariate analysis of factors relating to clinical reasoning, higher education level (B = 9.5, P = 0.018) and organizational position (B = 4.3, P = 0.017) were predictors of clinical reasoning score. DISCUSSION: Existing nursing models such as King's, which is closely related to clinical reasoning, can be used more in educational and clinical systems, and as a clinical guide for promoting the clinical reasoning of nurses and students.

Indexed as

Models, NursingAdultCross-Sectional StudiesHumansYoung AdultClinical reasoningKing’s modelNurses

Identifiers

PMID38481323
PMCPMC10938746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.