Observational studyBMC medical education2024
Descriptive feedback with targeted education to improve telephonic escalation of care: a simulation-based study.
Observational study in BMC medical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAwareness of communication failures in healthcare has necessitated the implementation of standardized, validated handover tools such as Identification, Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation (ISBAR). Although educational sessions improve communication, the effectiveness of individualized care escalation communication training is unknown. The primary aim was to conduct a simulation-based study to assess individualized one-on-one communication training for junior medical doctors for improving care escalation in pediatric emergencies. The secondary aim was to assess the evaluation of the training.
methodsThe prospective observational study assessed participants pre- and post-intervention. In Session One, participants presented a written case scenario telephonically to two senior pediatricians. Fifty participants were scored using an 18-item checklist based on the ISBAR tool and "free text" responses. Immediately following case presentations, participants completed individualized one-on-one 30-minute educational sessions regarding self-reflection, didactic teaching, and constructive feedback based on the ISBAR. Session Two included a second case presentation and reassessment. We conducted qualitative analysis of supervisor's feedback on performance and trainee doctor's evaluation of the training.
resultsThere was significant improvement in 8 of the 18 components of the ISBAR checklist. All elements of care escalation were significantly improved, and overall communication was higher post-intervention (P < 0.001); however, no improvement was noted in participants' explorations of differential diagnoses (P = 0.263). The qualitative analysis identified themes of improved urgency in seeking senior support and conversational clarity from supervisors, and improved intervention quality and self-confidence from participants.
conclusionsIndividualized communication training may improve pediatric emergency care escalation and communication among junior doctors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.