Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38481211›Full record

Trial reportBMC oral health2024

Correlation between pulp sensibility and magnetic resonance signal intensity following regenerative endodontic procedures in mature necrotic teeth- a retrospective cohort study.

Noha Mohamed El-Kateb, Amr Mohamed Abdallah, Rania Noaman ElBackly

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC oral health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03804450 (Magnetic Resonance Imaging Assessment of Pulp Regeneration Following Regenerative Endodontic Procedures in Mature Teeth), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03804450 phase2completednot on this map

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Assessment of Pulp Regeneration Following Regenerative Endodontic Procedures in Mature Teeth

TypeinterventionalSponsorAlexandria UniversityRan2017 to 2018Enrolled18ConditionsPulp Necroses, Periapical Lesion, RegenerationArmsRegenerative endodontic procedures (REPs)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Noha Mohamed El-KatebConservative Dentistry Department, Endodontics Division, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Champollion Street, El Azareta., Alexandra, Egypt. n_a572007@hotmail.com.
Amr Mohamed AbdallahConservative Dentistry Department, Endodontics Division, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Champollion Street, El Azareta., Alexandra, Egypt.
Rania Noaman ElBacklyConservative Dentistry Department, Endodontics Division, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Champollion Street, El Azareta., Alexandra, Egypt.
Alexandria University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith increasing studies being published on regenerative endodontic procedures (REPs) as a treatment modality for mature necrotic teeth, the assessment of outcomes following regenerative endodontic procedures has become more challenging and the demand for a better understanding of the regenerated tissues following this treatment is rising. The study aimed to correlate cold, electric pulp testing (EPT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) signal intensity (SI) in mature necrotic teeth treated with regenerative endodontic procedures. METHODOLOGY: This retrospective cohort study included eighteen adult patients who experienced tooth necrosis in mature maxillary anterior teeth recruited from the outpatient clinic, Conservative Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt from July 2017 until December 2018 with 12 months of follow-up. regenerative endodontic procedures via blood clot were performed. The canals were instrumented by ProTaper Next (PTN) files until final sizes X3 or X5. Biodentine was used as cervical plug material. Pre and post-operative clinical follow-up was done where the patients' responses to cold and electric pulp testing were given a scoring system and were compared to the normal contralateral tooth. Pre and post-operative magnetic resonance imaging signal intensity of both the involved tooth and its contralateral at the middle and the apical thirds of the root canals were assessed after 3, 6, and 12 months. Data was analyzed using the ANOVA, Friedman and Bonferroni tests. Significance was set at a p-value < 0.05.

resultsAll 18 teeth scored a baseline score of "2" for cold and electric pulp testing. There was a significant difference between scores of the cold test at baseline and 12-month follow-up (p < 0.001). There was a significant difference between scores of the electric pulp testing of baseline and 12-month follow-up (p < 0.001). There was a moderately significant indirect (inverse) correlation between magnetic resonance imaging signal intensity and cold test in both the middle and apical thirds at 12 months. No significant correlations were detected between magnetic resonance imaging signal intensity and electric pulp testingat any of the time intervals (p > 0.05).

conclusionMagnetic resonance imaging is a successful non-invasive method to assess outcomes of regenerative endodontic procedures and correlating it with another reliable method of assessing pulpal responses, cold test, could validate these outcomes. CLINICAL

trial registrationThe study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (ID: NCT03804450).

Indexed as

Periapical PeriodontitisRegenerative EndodonticsAdultDental PulpDental Pulp NecrosisHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyNecrosisRetrospective StudiesRoot Canal TherapyElectric pulp testEndo-Ice testMagnetic resonance imagingNecrotic pulpSignal intensity

Identifiers

PMID38481211
PMCPMC10935898
OpenAlexW4392742484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.