Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38481166›Full record

Trial reportBMC primary care2024

Barriers and facilitators to primary care management of type 2 diabetes in Shijiazhuang City, China: a mixed methods study.

Xuanchen Tao, Limin Mao, Puhong Zhang, Xinyan Ma, Zhenyu Liang, Kaige Sun, David Peiris

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC primary care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02726100 (Systematic Medical Assessment, Referral and Treatment for Diabetes Care in China Using Lay Family Health Promoters), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02726100 nacompletednot on this map

Systematic Medical Assessment, Referral and Treatment for Diabetes Care in China Using Lay Family Health Promoters

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe George Institute for Global Health, ChinaRan2017 to 2021Enrolled2,073ConditionsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Hypertension, DyslipidemiasArmsSMARTHealth Diabetes
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Xuanchen TaoThe George Institute for Global Health, Beijing, China.
Limin MaoCenter for Social Research in Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Puhong ZhangThe George Institute for Global Health, Beijing, China. zpuhong@georgeinstitute.org.cn.
Xinyan MaShijiazhuang Center for Disease Control, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, China. xinyanmacn@hotmail.com.
Zhenyu LiangShijiazhuang Center for Disease Control, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, China.
Kaige SunThe George Institute for Global Health, Beijing, China.
David PeirisThe George Institute for Global Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe prevalence of type 2 diabetes (T2DM) in China is over 10%, affecting around 114 million people. Despite the inclusion of T2DM in the National Basic Public Health Service Program (NBPHSP), most people with T2DM experience challenges in achieving optimal management targets. This study aimed to identify barriers and facilitators of diabetes management from the perspectives of primary health care (PHC) service providers and recipients.

methodsThis mixed-methods study was conducted in Shijiazhuang City, Hebei Province, China. A quantitative PHC facility assessment survey was conducted in all administrative districts and qualitative in-depth interviews were conducted in one district to government officials, medical staff, patients with T2DM, and their family members. Interviews were thematically analyzed, and all findings were synthesized using Michie's COM-B theory.

resultsA total of 197 village/community level PHC facilities and 66 township/street level PHC facilities answered the survey, and 42 in-depth interviews were conducted. The key facilitators stemmed from the NBPHSP policy, which standardized the basic infrastructure, medical equipment, and medication for the PHC facilities, provided training on NCD prevention and control, and compensated the PHC workers. However, we identified a detrimental cycle among PHC providers characterized by inadequate capacity, overwhelming workloads, insufficient income, limited career development opportunities, and challenges in attracting young talents. Although patients were covered by the national medical insurance schemes, they experienced capability constraints primarily driven by low education levels, advanced age, low health literacy, and a proliferation of misinformation. These factors influenced patients' motivation to be actively engaged in care and contributed to inertia to intensify treatment and achieve their clinical management goals.

conclusionThis study identifies several major facilitators and barriers from the perspectives of both PHC providers and patients with T2DM. Our findings suggest there are substantial opportunities to strengthen the NBPHSP, including improving the capacity and the income level of the PHC providers, attracting and retaining skilled health workers in rural areas, supporting patients to improve their health literacy and take a more active role in their health care, and improving access to high-quality care through digital health approaches.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov (record NCT02726100, 03/22/2016).

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Primary Health CareAmbulatory Care FacilitiesDelivery of Health CareHumansQualitative ResearchBehavior Change WheelChinaDiabetesMixed methodsPrimary Healthcare

Identifiers

PMID38481166
PMCPMC10935988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.