ArticleBiophysical journal2024
Calculation of protein-ligand binding entropies using a rule-based molecular fingerprint.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multi-Objective Loss Function For Free Energy Calculations.ACM-BCB ... ... : the ... ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology and Biomedicine. ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology and Biomedicine · 2025Article
- Machine learning tools advance biophysics.Biophysical journal · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The use of fast in silico prediction methods for protein-ligand binding free energies holds significant promise for the initial phases of drug development. Numerous traditional physics-based models (e.g., implicit solvent models), however, tend to either neglect or heavily approximate entropic contributions to binding due to their computational complexity. Consequently, such methods often yield imprecise assessments of binding strength. Machine learning models provide accurate predictions and can often outperform physics-based models. They, however, are often prone to overfitting, and the interpretation of their results can be difficult. Physics-guided machine learning models combine the consistency of physics-based models with the accuracy of modern data-driven algorithms. This work integrates physics-based model conformational entropies into a graph convolutional network. We introduce a new neural network architecture (a rule-based graph convolutional network) that generates molecular fingerprints according to predefined rules specifically optimized for binding free energy calculations. Our results on 100 small host-guest systems demonstrate significant improvements in convergence and preventing overfitting. We additionally demonstrate the transferability of our proposed hybrid model by training it on the aforementioned host-guest systems and then testing it on six unrelated protein-ligand systems. Our new model shows little difference in training set accuracy compared to a previous model but an order-of-magnitude improvement in test set accuracy. Finally, we show how the results of our hybrid model can be interpreted in a straightforward fashion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.