Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38481102›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2024

Calculation of protein-ligand binding entropies using a rule-based molecular fingerprint.

Ali Risheh, Alles Rebel, Paul S Nerenberg, Negin Forouzesh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Multi-Objective Loss Function For Free Energy Calculations.ACM-BCB ... ... : the ... ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology and Biomedicine. ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology and Biomedicine · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ali RishehDepartment of Computer Science, California State University, Los Angeles, California.
Alles RebelDepartment of Computer Science, California State University, Los Angeles, California.
Paul S NerenbergKravis Department of Integrated Sciences, Claremont McKenna College, Claremont, California.
Negin ForouzeshDepartment of Computer Science, California State University, Los Angeles, California. Electronic address: neginf@calstatela.edu.

Funding

Improving the Accuracy of Implicit Solvents with a Physics-Guided Neural NetworkR16GM146633 · NIGMS · CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY LOS ANGELES · PI FOROUZESH, NEGIN · 2022 to 2025
$755k
NIGMS NIH HHS R16 GM146633
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of fast in silico prediction methods for protein-ligand binding free energies holds significant promise for the initial phases of drug development. Numerous traditional physics-based models (e.g., implicit solvent models), however, tend to either neglect or heavily approximate entropic contributions to binding due to their computational complexity. Consequently, such methods often yield imprecise assessments of binding strength. Machine learning models provide accurate predictions and can often outperform physics-based models. They, however, are often prone to overfitting, and the interpretation of their results can be difficult. Physics-guided machine learning models combine the consistency of physics-based models with the accuracy of modern data-driven algorithms. This work integrates physics-based model conformational entropies into a graph convolutional network. We introduce a new neural network architecture (a rule-based graph convolutional network) that generates molecular fingerprints according to predefined rules specifically optimized for binding free energy calculations. Our results on 100 small host-guest systems demonstrate significant improvements in convergence and preventing overfitting. We additionally demonstrate the transferability of our proposed hybrid model by training it on the aforementioned host-guest systems and then testing it on six unrelated protein-ligand systems. Our new model shows little difference in training set accuracy compared to a previous model but an order-of-magnitude improvement in test set accuracy. Finally, we show how the results of our hybrid model can be interpreted in a straightforward fashion.

Indexed as

EntropyProtein BindingProteinsLigandsMachine LearningNeural Networks, ComputerLigandsProteins

Identifiers

PMID38481102
PMCPMC11393669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.