Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38480965›Full record

ArticleNature2024

Roll-to-roll, high-resolution 3D printing of shape-specific particles.

Jason M Kronenfeld, Lukas Rother, Max A Saccone, Maria T Dulay, Joseph M DeSimone

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Metastable Polymers for Circular 3D Printing.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Recyclable Photopolymers for Sustainable 3D Printing.Polymer science & technology (Washington, D.C.) · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Growth-Like Swelling of 2D Precursors for Efficient Fabrication of Complex 3D Microstructures.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Additive Manufacturing of Neuromorphic Systems.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2025
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jason M KronenfeldDepartment of Chemistry, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3026-2736
Lukas RotherDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-4815-1323
Max A SacconeDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3846-2908
Maria T DulayDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4678-3480
Joseph M DeSimoneDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. jmdesimone@stanford.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1764-8634

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Particle fabrication has attracted recent attention owing to its diverse applications in bioengineering

Identifiers

PMID38480965
PMCPMC10937373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.