Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38480928›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical nursing2025

Prevalence, risk factors and impact of delirium in adult inpatients in a tertiary care hospital: A point prevalence study.

Cornel Schiess, Lisa Hofer, Stefanie von Felten, Jan Bartussek, Heidi Petry, Jutta Ernst

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Cornel SchiessDepartment of Nursing and Allied Health Care Professions, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-7762-2081
Lisa HoferResearch Associate Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Stefanie von FeltenResearch Associate Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-5264-6394
Jan BartussekInstitute of Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Heidi PetryHead of Center of Clinical Nursing Science, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-5220-4273
Jutta ErnstResearch Associate, Center of Clinical Nursing Science, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-7619-8314
University Hospital of Zurich · CHUniversity of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo describe the point prevalence, risk factors and possible outcomes of delirium in inpatients.

designA cross-sectional point prevalence study.

backgroundDelirium is an acute brain syndrome that negatively affects patients, healthcare professionals and institutions alike; it is common in inpatient settings and is preventable in about one third of cases. Although guidelines recommend systematic screening and assessment, delirium is often unrecognised, undiagnosed and uncoded. There is a lack of valid data on this patient safety indicator in German-speaking countries.

methodsThe study was conducted in a tertiary care hospital in Switzerland on 5 July 2022. Specially trained registered nurses collected data from all patients meeting the inclusion criteria using CAM, ICDSC or mCAM-ED. Data were analysed descriptively with stratification by delirium status, setting and surgery.

resultsThe point prevalence across all settings was 6.9% (27/390), with large variation between settings: ICU 28.6% (4/14), IMC 28.0% (7/25), wards 4.6% (15/326) and ED 4% (1/25). Surgical patients were almost twice as likely to be affected as medical patients (8.9% vs. 4.8%). Patients with delirium differed most clearly from those without by having a larger number of ICD-10 F-diagnoses, a larger number of medications and higher age, which are known risk factors. Moreover, those with delirium had more missed diagnoses, increased mortality, more adverse events and higher costs.

conclusionsA significant number of patients experienced delirium and adverse clinical outcomes. Missed delirium diagnoses may further jeopardise patient safety and result in lost revenue. It remains unclear to what extent the risk factors and effects of delirium are causal and what determinants underlie missed diagnoses. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Consistent identification of high-risk patients and treatment settings with elevated risk, accompanied by the implementation of effective preventive and management strategies, is critical to addressing delirium.

Indexed as

DeliriumInpatientsTertiary Care CentersAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceRisk FactorsSwitzerlandcross‐sectional studiesdeliriumhospitalsinpatientsprevalence

Identifiers

PMID38480928
PMCPMC11808430
OpenAlexW4392814322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.