ArticleScientific reports2024
Machine learning insights into thrombo-ischemic risks and bleeding events through platelet lysophospholipids and acylcarnitine species.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Redefining Dual Antiplatelet Strategies After Acute Coronary Syndrome: Insights from Recent RCTs.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Patient Blood Management: A Systematic Review of Predictive, Diagnostic, and Decision Support Applications.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Reduced Platelet Aggregation and Plasma Cytokine Levels Mitigate Progressive Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD).Journal of inflammation research · 2025Article
- Novel 3-dimensional effective regurgitation orifice area quantification serves as a reliable tool to identify severe mitral valve regurgitation.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Coronary artery disease (CAD) often leads to adverse events resulting in significant disease burdens. Underlying risk factors often remain inapparent prior to disease incidence and the cardiovascular (CV) risk is not exclusively explained by traditional risk factors. Platelets inherently promote atheroprogression and enhanced platelet functions and distinct platelet lipid species are associated with disease severity in patients with CAD. Lipidomics data were acquired using mass spectrometry and processed alongside clinical data applying machine learning to model estimates of an increased CV risk in a consecutive CAD cohort (n = 595). By training machine learning models on CV risk measurements, stratification of CAD patients resulted in a phenotyping of risk groups. We found that distinct platelet lipids are associated with an increased CV or bleeding risk and independently predict adverse events. Notably, the addition of platelet lipids to conventional risk factors resulted in an increased diagnostic accuracy of patients with adverse CV events. Thus, patients with aberrant platelet lipid signatures and platelet functions are at elevated risk to develop adverse CV events. Machine learning combining platelet lipidome data and common clinical parameters demonstrated an increased diagnostic value in patients with CAD and might improve early risk discrimination and classification for CV events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.