Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38480736›Full record

ArticleNPJ microgravity2024

The effects of long-term exposure to microgravity and body orientation relative to gravity on perceived traveled distance.

Björn Jörges, Nils Bury, Meaghan McManus, Ambika Bansal, Robert S Allison, Michael Jenkin, Laurence R Harris

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ microgravity, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Björn JörgesCenter for Vision Research, York University, 4700 Keele Street, Toronto, ON, M3J 1P3, Canada. bjoerges@yorku.ca.
Nils BuryCenter for Vision Research, York University, 4700 Keele Street, Toronto, ON, M3J 1P3, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6119-2478
Meaghan McManusCenter for Vision Research, York University, 4700 Keele Street, Toronto, ON, M3J 1P3, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7262-0757
Ambika BansalCenter for Vision Research, York University, 4700 Keele Street, Toronto, ON, M3J 1P3, Canada.
Robert S AllisonCenter for Vision Research, York University, 4700 Keele Street, Toronto, ON, M3J 1P3, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4485-2665
Michael JenkinCenter for Vision Research, York University, 4700 Keele Street, Toronto, ON, M3J 1P3, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2969-0012
Laurence R HarrisCenter for Vision Research, York University, 4700 Keele Street, Toronto, ON, M3J 1P3, Canada. harris@yorku.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7154-8757

Funding

Gouvernement du Canada | Canadian Space Agency (Agence Spatiale Canadienne) 1SILSRA1-YorkGouvernement du Canada | Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (Conseil de Recherches en Sciences Naturelles et en Génie du Canada) RGPIN-2020-06061Gouvernement du Canada | Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (Conseil de Recherches en Sciences Naturelles et en Génie du Canada) RGPIN-2020-06093Gouvernement du Canada | Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (Conseil de Recherches en Sciences Naturelles et en Génie du Canada) RGPIN-2022-04556
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Self-motion perception is a multi-sensory process that involves visual, vestibular, and other cues. When perception of self-motion is induced using only visual motion, vestibular cues indicate that the body remains stationary, which may bias an observer's perception. When lowering the precision of the vestibular cue by for example, lying down or by adapting to microgravity, these biases may decrease, accompanied by a decrease in precision. To test this hypothesis, we used a move-to-target task in virtual reality. Astronauts and Earth-based controls were shown a target at a range of simulated distances. After the target disappeared, forward self-motion was induced by optic flow. Participants indicated when they thought they had arrived at the target's previously seen location. Astronauts completed the task on Earth (supine and sitting upright) prior to space travel, early and late in space, and early and late after landing. Controls completed the experiment on Earth using a similar regime with a supine posture used to simulate being in space. While variability was similar across all conditions, the supine posture led to significantly higher gains (target distance/perceived travel distance) than the sitting posture for the astronauts pre-flight and early post-flight but not late post-flight. No difference was detected between the astronauts' performance on Earth and onboard the ISS, indicating that judgments of traveled distance were largely unaffected by long-term exposure to microgravity. Overall, this constitutes mixed evidence as to whether non-visual cues to travel distance are integrated with relevant visual cues when self-motion is simulated using optic flow alone.

Identifiers

PMID38480736
PMCPMC10937641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.