Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38480603›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology experimental2024

Image quality and metal artifact reduction in total hip arthroplasty CT: deep learning-based algorithm versus virtual monoenergetic imaging and orthopedic metal artifact reduction.

Mark Selles, Ruud H H Wellenberg, Derk J Slotman, Ingrid M Nijholt, Jochen A C van Osch, Kees F van Dijke, Mario Maas, Martijn F Boomsma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology experimental, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Artificial intelligence in musculoskeletal applications: a primer for radiologists.Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey) · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mark SellesDepartment of Radiology, Isala, 8025 AB, Zwolle, the Netherlands. m.selles@isala.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1511-1438
Ruud H H WellenbergDepartment of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Derk J SlotmanDepartment of Radiology, Isala, 8025 AB, Zwolle, the Netherlands.
Ingrid M NijholtDepartment of Radiology, Isala, 8025 AB, Zwolle, the Netherlands.
Jochen A C van OschDepartment of Medical Physics, Isala, 8025 AB, Zwolle, the Netherlands.
Kees F van DijkeDepartment of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep, 1815 JD, Alkmaar, the Netherlands.
Mario MaasDepartment of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Martijn F BoomsmaDepartment of Radiology, Isala, 8025 AB, Zwolle, the Netherlands.

Funding

Philips Exhibit B-12
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo compare image quality, metal artifacts, and diagnostic confidence of conventional computed tomography (CT) images of unilateral total hip arthroplasty patients (THA) with deep learning-based metal artifact reduction (DL-MAR) to conventional CT and 130-keV monoenergetic images with and without orthopedic metal artifact reduction (O-MAR).

methodsConventional CT and 130-keV monoenergetic images with and without O-MAR and DL-MAR images of 28 unilateral THA patients were reconstructed. Image quality, metal artifacts, and diagnostic confidence in bone, pelvic organs, and soft tissue adjacent to the prosthesis were jointly scored by two experienced musculoskeletal radiologists. Contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) between bladder and fat and muscle and fat were measured. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests with Holm-Bonferroni correction were used.

resultsSignificantly higher image quality, higher diagnostic confidence, and less severe metal artifacts were observed on DL-MAR and images with O-MAR compared to images without O-MAR (p < 0.001 for all comparisons). Higher image quality, higher diagnostic confidence for bone and soft tissue adjacent to the prosthesis, and less severe metal artifacts were observed on DL-MAR when compared to conventional images and 130-keV monoenergetic images with O-MAR (p ≤ 0.014). CNRs were higher for DL-MAR and images with O-MAR compared to images without O-MAR (p < 0.001). Higher CNRs were observed on DL-MAR images compared to conventional images and 130-keV monoenergetic images with O-MAR (p ≤ 0.010).

conclusionsDL-MAR showed higher image quality, diagnostic confidence, and superior metal artifact reduction compared to conventional CT images and 130-keV monoenergetic images with and without O-MAR in unilateral THA patients. RELEVANCE STATEMENT: DL-MAR resulted into improved image quality, stronger reduction of metal artifacts, and improved diagnostic confidence compared to conventional and virtual monoenergetic images with and without metal artifact reduction, bringing DL-based metal artifact reduction closer to clinical application. KEY POINTS: • Metal artifacts introduced by total hip arthroplasty hamper radiologic assessment on CT. • A deep-learning algorithm (DL-MAR) was compared to dual-layer CT images with O-MAR. • DL-MAR showed best image quality and diagnostic confidence. • Highest contrast-to-noise ratios were observed on the DL-MAR images.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipDeep LearningAlgorithmsArtifactsHumansTomography, X-Ray ComputedArthroplasty (replacement, hip)ArtifactsArtificial intelligenceDeep learningTomography (x-ray computed)

Identifiers

PMID38480603
PMCPMC10937891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.