ArticleInternational urology and nephrology2024
Comparison of temperature and renal tissue thermal damage by holmium laser with different energy parameters during lithotripsy: in vitro porcine kidney model.
Article in International urology and nephrology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Animal models for calcium oxalate kidney stone research.Zoological research · 2026Review
- Effect of Conventional Versus Flexible and Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheaths on Ureteral Temperature Modulation During High-power Ho:YAG Laser Lithotripsy: An In Vitro Evaluation.European urology open science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveHolmium laser percutaneous nephrolithotripsy was simulated by porcine kidney calculus model in vitro to investigate thermal damage of renal tissue by different energy parameters of the holmium laser.
methodsWe placed human kidney calculus specimen in fresh vitro porcine kidney, then insert thermocouple temperature probes into the submucosa of the renal pelvis and reheated in a 37 °C water bath. A percutaneous nephrological sheath was used to penetrate the renal parenchyma with a moderate irrigation rate of 30 ml/min at 18 ℃. The Holmium laser was used to fragment the stones under a nephroscope, and the temperature was recorded.
resultsThe four independent models were lithotripsy with 30 W and 60 W laser for 5 and 10 min, respectively; the mean temperature of 30 W vs. 60 W within 5 min was 36.06 °C vs. 39.21 °C (t = 5.36, P < 0.01) and the highest temperature was 43.60 °C vs. 46.60 °C; the mean temperature of 30 W vs. 60 W within 10 min was 37.91 °C vs. 40.13 ℃ (t = 5.28, P < 0.01), maximum temperature 46.80 ℃ vs. 49.20 ℃. Pathologically, each kidney was observed to have different degrees of thermal damage lesions, and the higher power and longer time the more severe the injury, but the injury was mainly limited to the uroepithelial and subepithelial tissues, with rare damage to renal tubules.
conclusionThe higher laser excitation power and longer duration raised the intrarenal temperature significantly and caused a certain degree of thermal damage to the kidney tissue, but overall it was found to be safe and reliable. Urologists can avoid further side effects through surgical expertise.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38480602What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.