Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38480601›Full record

Trial reportClinical oral investigations2024

Efficacy of an automatic electric toothbrush with nylon bristles in dental plaque removal: a cross-over randomized controlled trial.

Maria Denisa Statie, Irene Lomonaco, Michele Nieri, Veronica Giuntini, Debora Franceschi, Lorenzo Franchi

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical oral investigations, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Maria Denisa StatieGraduate Orthodontic Program, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Università degli Studi di Firenze, Florence, Italy.
Irene LomonacoGraduate Orthodontic Program, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Università degli Studi di Firenze, Florence, Italy.
Michele NieriGraduate Orthodontic Program, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Università degli Studi di Firenze, Florence, Italy. michelenieri@gmail.com.
Veronica GiuntiniGraduate Orthodontic Program, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Università degli Studi di Firenze, Florence, Italy.
Debora FranceschiGraduate Orthodontic Program, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Università degli Studi di Firenze, Florence, Italy.
Lorenzo FranchiGraduate Orthodontic Program, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Università degli Studi di Firenze, Florence, Italy.
University of Florence · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe objective of this single-use, five-treatment, five-period, cross-over randomized controlled trial (RCT) was to compare the efficacy in dental plaque removal of a new Y-shaped automatic electric toothbrush (Y-brush) compared to a U-shaped automatic electric toothbrush (U-brush), a manual toothbrushing procedure (for 45 and 120 s), and no brushing (negative control). MATERIALS AND

methodsEligible participants were volunteer students randomized to the treatments in the five periods of the study. The primary outcome measure was the reduction in full-mouth plaque score (FMPS) after brushing while the secondary outcome variable was a visual analogic scale (VAS) on subjective clean mouth sensation. Mixed models were performed for difference in FMPS and VAS.

resultsAfter brushing procedures, manual toothbrushing (120 s) showed a statistically significant reduction in FMPS than Y-brush (difference 36.9; 95%CI 29.6 to 44.1, p < 0.0001), U-brush (difference 42.3; 95%CI 35.1 to 49.6, p < 0.0001), manual brushing (45 s) (difference 13.8; 95%CI 6.5 to 21.1, p < 0.0001), and No brushing (difference 46.6; 95%CI 39.3 to 53.9, p < 0.0001). Y-brush was significantly more effective than No brushing (difference 9.8; 95%CI 2.5 to 17.0, p = 0.0030), while there was no significant difference compared to U- brush. Similar results were obtained for the differences in the Clean Mouth VAS.

conclusionsY-brush was significantly more effective than no brushing (negative control) in removing dental plaque. When compared to manual toothbrushing for both 45 and 120 s, however, Y-brush was less effective in dental plaque removal. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Modified design of automatic toothbrushing devices could improve plaque reduction, especially in patients with intellectual disabilities or motor difficulties.

Indexed as

Dental PlaqueSuccinimidesToothbrushingCross-Over StudiesDental Plaque IndexEquipment DesignHumansNylonsSingle-Blind Method2-(4-fluorophenyl)-N-methylsuccinimideNylonsSuccinimidesDental plaqueMtoothbrushOral hygienePowered toothbrushRandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID38480601
PMCPMC10937766
OpenAlexW4392816375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.