Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38480569›Full record

ArticlePediatric cardiology2024

Clinical Outcomes and Echocardiographic Predictors of Reintervention After Interrupted Aortic Arch Repair.

Hannah L McMullen, Jamie K Harrington, David Blitzer, Nikhil Pasumarti, Stéphanie Levasseur, Emile Bacha, David Kalfa

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hannah L McMullenDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford Health Care, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Jamie K HarringtonDivision of Pediatric Cardiology, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
David BlitzerDivision of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Section of Pediatric and Congenital Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Morgan Stanley Children Hospital-New York Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, 3959 Broadway, CHN-274, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Nikhil PasumartiDivision of Pediatric Cardiology, Morgan Stanley Children Hospital-New York Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, 3959 Broadway, CHN-274, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Stéphanie LevasseurDivision of Pediatric Cardiology, Morgan Stanley Children Hospital-New York Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, 3959 Broadway, CHN-274, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Emile BachaDivision of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Section of Pediatric and Congenital Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Morgan Stanley Children Hospital-New York Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, 3959 Broadway, CHN-274, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
David KalfaDivision of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Section of Pediatric and Congenital Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Morgan Stanley Children Hospital-New York Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, 3959 Broadway, CHN-274, New York, NY, 10032, USA. dk2757@cumc.columbia.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Left ventricular outflow tract obstruction (LVOTO) remains a significant complication after primary repair of interrupted aortic arch with ventricular septal defect (IAA-VSD). Clinical and echocardiographic predictors for LVOTO reoperation are controversial and procedures to prophylactically prevent future LVOTO are not reliable. However, it is important to identify the patients at risk for future LVOTO intervention after repair of IAA-VSD. Patients who underwent single-stage IAA-VSD repair at our center 2006-2021 were retrospectively reviewed, excluding patients with associated cardiac lesions. Two-dimensional measurements, LVOT gradients, and 4-chamber (4C) and short-axis (SAXM) strain were obtained from preoperative and predischarge echocardiograms. Univariate risk analysis for LVOTO reoperation was performed using unpaired t-test. Thirty patients were included with 21 (70%) IAA subtype B and mean weight at surgery 3.0 kg. Repair included aortic arch patch augmentation in 20 patients and subaortic obstruction intervention in three patients. Seven (23%) required reoperations for LVOTO. Patient characteristics were similar between patients who required LVOT reoperation and those who did not. Patch augmentation was not associated with LVOTO reintervention. Patients requiring reintervention had significantly smaller LVOT AP diameter preoperatively and at discharge, and higher LVOT velocity, smaller AV annular diameter, and ascending aortic diameter at discharge. There was an association between LVOT-indexed cross-sectional area (CSAcm

Indexed as

Aorta, ThoracicEchocardiographyHeart Septal Defects, VentricularReoperationVentricular Outflow ObstructionCardiac Surgical ProceduresFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMalePostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAortic arch repairEchocardiographyInterrupted aortic archReintervention

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.