ArticleThoracic cancer2024
Impact of HER2-low expression on the efficacy of endocrine therapy with or without CDK4/6 inhibitor in HR-positive/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: A prospective study.
Article in Thoracic cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- New perspectives on endocrine therapy suitability for hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer in clinical practice.Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2026Review
- Impact of HER2-Low Expression on Clinical Outcomes in Metastatic Breast Cancer Treated with CDK4/6 Inhibitors.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Understanding and overcoming CDK4/6 inhibitor resistance in HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer: clinical and molecular perspectives.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2025Review
- Patterns of treatment and outcomes of patients with metastatic HER2-low breast cancer treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors and hormone therapy.Drugs in context · 2025Article
- Impact of HER2-low expression on the efficacy of endocrine therapy with or without CDK4/6 inhibitor in HR-positive/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: A prospective study.Thoracic cancer · 2024Article
- Prognosis in HR-positive metastatic breast cancer with HER2-low versus HER2-zero treated with CDK4/6 inhibitor and endocrine therapy: a meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- The impact of HER2 low positivity in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.Cancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markersArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCDK4/6 inhibitors in combination with traditional endocrine therapy (ET) have become the recommended first-line therapy for HR-positive/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC). The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the relationship between HER2-low expression and clinical outcomes in HR-positive/HER2-negative MBC patients receiving ET with or without CDK4/6 inhibitors.
methodsBetween April 2016 and November 2019, 233 women with HR-positive/HER2-negative MBC who received ET with or without CDK4/6 inhibitors were enrolled into the study. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics, Kaplan-Meier curves, and Cox proportional hazards models.
resultsHER2-low and HER2-zero subgroups in the CDK4/6 inhibitor plus ET cohort showed no significant difference in the median PFS (10.9 vs. 8.0 months; hazard ratio: 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.64-1. 30; p = 0.65), while HER2-low subgroup showed a significantly shorter median PFS compared to the HER2-zero subgroup in the ET alone cohort (5.6 vs. 17.0 months; hazard ratio: 2.82; 95% CI: 1.34-5.93; p = 0.0044). Moreover, the objective response rate was significantly lower in the HER2-low subgroup than the HER2-zero subgroup in the ET alone cohort (10.5% vs. 40.0%, p = 0.047). Lastly, no significant difference was observed in the overall survival between the HER2-low and HER2-zero subgroups in both cohorts.
conclusionThis study suggested that HER2-low expression may predict the efficacy of ET but not that of CDK4/6 inhibitor plus ET in HR-positive/HER2-negative MBC patients. The results of this study highlight the importance of integrating HER2 status in tailoring personalized treatment strategies for HR-positive MBC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.