Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38479780›Full record

ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2024

Parasagittal and Superior Sagittal Sinus Dural Arteriovenous Fistulas: Clinical Presentations, Imaging Characteristics, and Treatment Strategies.

Tze Phei Kee, Antti Lindgren, Hiro Kiyosue, Timo Krings

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 4 countries.

Tze Phei KeeFrom the Division of Neuroradiology, Joint Department of Medical Imaging and University Medical Imaging Toronto (T.P.K., A.L., T.K.), Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada tpkee98@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-4595-2801
Antti LindgrenFrom the Division of Neuroradiology, Joint Department of Medical Imaging and University Medical Imaging Toronto (T.P.K., A.L., T.K.), Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Hiro KiyosueDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology (H.K.), Kumamoto University Faculty of Medicine, Kumamoto, Japan.
Timo KringsFrom the Division of Neuroradiology, Joint Department of Medical Imaging and University Medical Imaging Toronto (T.P.K., A.L., T.K.), Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6321-5787
University Health Network · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeParasagittal and superior sagittal sinus (SSS) dural arteriovenous fistulas (DAVFs) are often inappropriately classified. We explore the clinical presentations, imaging characteristics, and endovascular treatment strategies of these 2 DAVF subtypes. MATERIALS AND

methodsClinical and imaging data of 19 patients with SSS or parasagittal sinus DAVFs who underwent endovascular treatment in our institution between 2017 and 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The angiographic findings, endovascular treatment strategies, and angiographic outcomes were evaluated and recorded.

resultsAmong these 19 patients, 14 had a parasagittal DAVF, 4 had a SSS DAVF, and 1 patient had both parasagittal and SSS DAVF. Only 1 (1/19, 5.26%) patient presented with intracranial hemorrhage. For the parasagittal DAVF group, most of the shunts were located along the middle third of the SSS (12/15, 80%), on the dura in proximity with the junctional zone between the bridging vein and SSS (15/15, 100%), with ipsilateral cortical venous reflux (CVR) (15/15, 100%). For the SSS DAVF group, all 5 patients had shunting zone along the middle third of the SSS, on the sinus or parasinus wall, with bilateral CVR. Transarterial embolization, via the middle meningeal artery as the primary route of access, was the primary treatment approach in 95% of cases (19/20). Reflux of embolization material into the SSS was observed in 1 case (1/5, 20%) of SSS DAVF in which balloon sinus protection was not used during embolization.

conclusionsOur study found that parasagittal DAVFs have shunting point(s) centered on the junctional zone of the bridging vein and the SSS with ipsilateral CVR, while SSS DAVFs have shunting point(s) centered on the sinus or parasinus wall with bilateral CVR. Transarterial embolization via the middle meningeal artery can be used as the primary treatment strategy in most cases. Balloon sinus protection during embolization is not necessary in cases of parasagittal DAVF with occluded or stenosed connection with the SSS but its use should be considered in cases of SSS DAVF with patent sinus.

Indexed as

Central Nervous System Vascular MalformationsCerebral AngiographyEmbolization, TherapeuticEndovascular ProceduresSuperior Sagittal SinusAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID38479780
PMCPMC11383401
OpenAlexW4392762948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.