Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38479348›Full record

ArticleCortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior2024

Linguistic and attentional factors - Not statistical regularities - Contribute to word-selective neural responses with FPVS-oddball paradigms.

Aliette Lochy, Bruno Rossion, Matthew Lambon Ralph, Angélique Volfart, Olaf Hauk, Christine Schiltz

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 5 countries.

Aliette LochyInstitute of Cognitive Science and Assessment, University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg; Psychological Science Institute (IPSY), UCLouvain, Louvain-La-Neuve, Belgium. Electronic address: aliette.lochy@uni.lu.
Bruno RossionUniversité de Lorraine, CNRS, Nancy, France; CHRU-Nancy, Service de Neurologie, Nancy, France.
Matthew Lambon RalphMRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, UK.
Angélique VolfartSchool of Psychology and Counselling, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Australia.
Olaf HaukMRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, UK.
Christine SchiltzInstitute of Cognitive Science and Assessment, University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.
MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit · GBUniversity of Luxembourg · LUCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRQueensland University of Technology · AU

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_00005/14
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies using frequency-tagging in electroencephalography (EEG) have dramatically increased in the past 10 years, in a variety of domains and populations. Here we used Fast Periodic Visual Stimulation (FPVS) combined with an oddball design to explore visual word recognition. Given the paradigm's high sensitivity, it is crucial for future basic research and clinical application to prove its robustness across variations of designs, stimulus types and tasks. This paradigm uses periodicity of brain responses to measure discrimination between two experimentally defined categories of stimuli presented periodically. EEG was recorded in 22 adults who viewed words inserted every 5 stimuli (at 2 Hz) within base stimuli presented at 10 Hz. Using two discrimination levels (deviant words among nonwords or pseudowords), we assessed the impact of relative frequency of item repetition (set size or item repetition controlled for deviant versus base stimuli), and of the orthogonal task (focused or deployed spatial attention). Word-selective occipito-temporal responses were robust at the individual level (significant in 95% of participants), left-lateralized, larger for the prelexical (nonwords) than lexical (pseudowords) contrast, and stronger with a deployed spatial attention task as compared to the typically used focused task. Importantly, amplitudes were not affected by item repetition. These results help understanding the factors influencing word-selective EEG responses and support the validity of FPVS-EEG oddball paradigms, as they confirm that word-selective responses are linguistic. Second, they show its robustness against design-related factors that could induce statistical (ir)regularities in item rate. They also confirm its high individual sensitivity and demonstrate how it can be optimized, using a deployed rather than focused attention task, to measure implicit word recognition processes in typical and atypical populations.

Indexed as

BrainElectroencephalographyAdultAttentionHumansLinguisticsPhotic StimulationAttentionEEGFPVSFrequency-taggingStatistical learningVisual word recognition

Identifiers

PMID38479348
PMCPMC10988773
OpenAlexW4391781843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.