Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38478966›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2024

A comprehensive lung CT landmark pair dataset for evaluating deformable image registration algorithms.

Edward R Criscuolo, Yabo Fu, Yao Hao, Zhendong Zhang, Deshan Yang

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [A reweighted graph matching-based algorithm for automatic extraction of corresponding landmarks in medical images].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Edward R CriscuoloDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Yabo FuMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Yao HaoWashington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Zhendong ZhangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Deshan YangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Duke University · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Develop a large-scale library of comprehensive deformable image registration (DIR) benchmark datasets and an integrated framework for quantifying accuracy of patient-specific DIR resultsR01EB029431 · NIBIB · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI YANG, DESHAN · 2021 to 2021
$1.6M
National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (NIBIB) R01-EB029431NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB029431
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDeformable image registration (DIR) is a key enabling technology in many diagnostic and therapeutic tasks, but often does not meet the required robustness and accuracy for supporting clinical tasks. This is in large part due to a lack of high-quality benchmark datasets by which new DIR algorithms can be evaluated. Our team was supported by the National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering to develop DIR benchmark dataset libraries for multiple anatomical sites, comprising of large numbers of highly accurate landmark pairs on matching blood vessel bifurcations. Here we introduce our lung CT DIR benchmark dataset library, which was developed to improve upon the number and distribution of landmark pairs in current public lung CT benchmark datasets. ACQUISITION AND VALIDATION

methodsThirty CT image pairs were acquired from several publicly available repositories as well as authors' institution with IRB approval. The data processing workflow included multiple steps: (1) The images were denoised. (2) Lungs, airways, and blood vessels were automatically segmented. (3) Bifurcations were directly detected on the skeleton of the segmented vessel tree. (4) Falsely identified bifurcations were filtered out using manually defined rules. (5) A DIR was used to project landmarks detected on the first image onto the second image of the image pair to form landmark pairs. (6) Landmark pairs were manually verified. This workflow resulted in an average of 1262 landmark pairs per image pair. Estimates of the landmark pair target registration error (TRE) using digital phantoms were 0.4 mm ± 0.3 mm. DATA FORMAT AND USAGE NOTES: The data is published in Zenodo at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8200423. Instructions for use can be found at https://github.com/deshanyang/Lung-DIR-QA. POTENTIAL APPLICATIONS: The dataset library generated in this work is the largest of its kind to date and will provide researchers with a new and improved set of ground truth benchmarks for quantitatively validating DIR algorithms within the lung.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsImage Processing, Computer-AssistedLungTomography, X-Ray ComputedHumansdeformable image registrationground truth datasetlung motion

Identifiers

PMID38478966
PMCPMC11302745
OpenAlexW4392764056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.