Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38478848›Full record

ArticleACS chemical neuroscience2024

Still in Search for an EAAT Activator: GT949 Does Not Activate EAAT2, nor EAAT3 in Impedance and Radioligand Uptake Assays.

Lieve van Veggel, Tamara A M Mocking, Hubert J Sijben, Rongfang Liu, Marina Gorostiola González, Majlen A Dilweg, Jeroen Royakkers, Anna Li, Vijay Kumar, Yin Yao Dong and 7 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS chemical neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Lieve van VeggelDepartment of Neuroscience, BIOMED Biomedical Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, Hasselt University, 3590 Hasselt, Belgium.
Tamara A M MockingLeiden Academic Centre for Drug Research (LACDR), Division of Drug Discovery and Safety, Leiden University, 2333 Leiden, The Netherlands.
Hubert J SijbenLeiden Academic Centre for Drug Research (LACDR), Division of Drug Discovery and Safety, Leiden University, 2333 Leiden, The Netherlands.
Rongfang LiuLeiden Academic Centre for Drug Research (LACDR), Division of Drug Discovery and Safety, Leiden University, 2333 Leiden, The Netherlands.
Marina Gorostiola GonzálezLeiden Academic Centre for Drug Research (LACDR), Division of Drug Discovery and Safety, Leiden University, 2333 Leiden, The Netherlands.
Majlen A DilwegLeiden Academic Centre for Drug Research (LACDR), Division of Drug Discovery and Safety, Leiden University, 2333 Leiden, The Netherlands.
Jeroen RoyakkersSensor Engineering Department, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Maastricht University, 6200 Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6827-0969
Anna LiCentre for Medicines Discovery, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, OX3 7BN Oxford, U.K.
Vijay KumarCentre for Medicines Discovery, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, OX3 7BN Oxford, U.K.
Yin Yao DongNuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Oxford, OX3 7BN Oxford, U.K.
Alex BullockCentre for Medicines Discovery, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, OX3 7BN Oxford, U.K.ORCID 0000-0001-6757-0436
David B SauerCentre for Medicines Discovery, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, OX3 7BN Oxford, U.K.
Hanne DiliënSensor Engineering Department, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Maastricht University, 6200 Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Gerard J P van WestenLeiden Academic Centre for Drug Research (LACDR), Division of Drug Discovery and Safety, Leiden University, 2333 Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0717-1817
Rudy SchreiberSection of Psychopharmacology, Neuropsychology and Psychopharmacology, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, 6200 Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Laura H HeitmanLeiden Academic Centre for Drug Research (LACDR), Division of Drug Discovery and Safety, Leiden University, 2333 Leiden, The Netherlands.
Tim VanmierloDepartment of Neuroscience, BIOMED Biomedical Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, Hasselt University, 3590 Hasselt, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-2912-0578
Leiden University · NLMaastricht University · NLUniversity of Oxford · GBMRC Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Excitatory amino acid transporters (EAATs) are important regulators of amino acid transport and in particular glutamate. Recently, more interest has arisen in these transporters in the context of neurodegenerative diseases. This calls for ways to modulate these targets to drive glutamate transport, EAAT2 and EAAT3 in particular. Several inhibitors (competitive and noncompetitive) exist to block glutamate transport; however, activators remain scarce. Recently, GT949 was proposed as a selective activator of EAAT2, as tested in a radioligand uptake assay. In the presented research, we aimed to validate the use of GT949 to activate EAAT2-driven glutamate transport by applying an innovative, impedance-based, whole-cell assay (xCELLigence). A broad range of GT949 concentrations in a variety of cellular environments were tested in this assay. As expected, no activation of EAAT3 could be detected. Yet, surprisingly, no biological activation of GT949 on EAAT2 could be observed in this assay either. To validate whether the impedance-based assay was not suited to pick up increased glutamate uptake or if the compound might not induce activation in this setup, we performed radioligand uptake assays. Two setups were utilized; a novel method compared to previously published research, and in a reproducible fashion copying the methods used in the existing literature. Nonetheless, activation of neither EAAT2 nor EAAT3 could be observed in these assays. Furthermore, no evidence of GT949 binding or stabilization of purified EAAT2 could be observed in a thermal shift assay. To conclude, based on experimental evidence in the present study GT949 requires specific assay conditions, which are difficult to reproduce, and the compound cannot simply be classified as an activator of EAAT2 based on the presented evidence. Hence, further research is required to develop the tools needed to identify new EAAT modulators and use their potential as a therapeutic target.

Indexed as

Excitatory Amino Acid Transporter 2Glutamic AcidBiological TransportElectric ImpedanceExcitatory Amino Acid Transporter 3Excitatory Amino Acid Transporter 2Excitatory Amino Acid Transporter 3Glutamic AcidEAAT2glutamateGT949modulationradioligand uptaketransport

Identifiers

PMID38478848
PMCPMC10995951
OpenAlexW4392744701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.