ArticleSingapore medical journal2026
Diagnostic threshold and performance of anion gap in screening for high anion gap metabolic acidosis.
Article in Singapore medical journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- The anion gap: basic chemistry, powerful clinical implications.Singapore medical journal · 2026Article
- A novel corrected anion gap links metabolic acid attack to peptic ulcer disease.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe anion gap (AG) is commonly used to screen for acid-base disorders. It was proposed that the cut-off for high anion gap metabolic acidosis (HAGMA) may be lower with current laboratory techniques, although modern laboratory equipment are still calibrated to familiar reference ranges established with earlier techniques. The appropriate cut-off for HAGMA is unclear. This study aimed to assess the performance of AG as a screening test for HAGMA and to determine the optimal diagnostic threshold of AG for HAGMA.
methodsThis was a retrospective analysis of a large, anonymised dataset extracted by computerised protocol from 2017 to 2019. All inpatients with blood samples taken for organic acids (lactate, ketone or salicylate) paired with a metabolic panel were included. The target condition was HAGMA secondary to elevated blood lactate, ketone and/or salicylate. Sensitivity for HAGMA was explored at various AG cut-off levels.
resultsOf 16,475 patients, 2,621 had organic acidosis. Median age was 65 years, and median estimated glomerular filtration rate was 70 mL/min/1.73 m 2 . With organic acidosis, the median AG was 23 (interquartile range [IQR] 20-29) mEq/L, while without organic acidosis, the median AG was 16 (IQR 14-19) mEq/L. The area under the curve-receiver operating characteristic of AG for HAGMA was 0.873. Desired sensitivity for HAGMA was set at ≥95%, and this was found with an AG threshold of ≥15 mEq/L (sensitivity 98.1%, specificity 34.0%).
conclusionThe recommended AG threshold value is ≥15 mEq/L with a high sensitivity for HAGMA. The AG should always be interpreted with the clinical context, and it should be repeated as the clinical picture evolves.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.