Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38478570›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Whole systems approaches to diet and healthy weight: A scoping review of reviews.

Gavin Breslin, Olujoke Fakoya, Wendy Wills, Nigel Lloyd, Charis Bontoft, Amander Wellings, Sian Harding, John Jackson, Katherine Barrett, Adam P Wagner and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The impact of public policy on socioeconomic equity in physical activity: a systematic review.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Systems Science in Nutrition and Dietetics Research: A Practical Lens for Applying Systems Approaches in Research.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. BMJ open · 2026
    Article
  6. Goals in Nutrition Science 2025-2030.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. The Persistent Poverty Initiative's Framework to Address Social and Economic Determinants of Cancer.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Integrating Systems Thinking and Behavioural Science.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Gavin BreslinSchool of Psychology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2481-0860
Olujoke FakoyaDepartment of Psychology, Sport and Geography, School of Life and Medical Sciences, College Lane, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3545-7567
Wendy WillsCentre for Research in Public Health and Community Care (CRIPACC), School of Health and Social Work, College Lane, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom.
Nigel LloydDepartment of Psychology, Sport and Geography, School of Life and Medical Sciences, College Lane, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4218-1957
Charis BontoftDepartment of Psychology, Sport and Geography, School of Life and Medical Sciences, College Lane, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom.
Amander WellingsMember of the PHIRST Public Involvement in Research Group, School of Life and Medical Sciences & School of Health & Social Work, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom.
Sian HardingMember of the PHIRST Public Involvement in Research Group, School of Life and Medical Sciences & School of Health & Social Work, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom.
John JacksonMember of the PHIRST Public Involvement in Research Group, School of Life and Medical Sciences & School of Health & Social Work, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom.
Katherine BarrettMember of the PHIRST Public Involvement in Research Group, School of Life and Medical Sciences & School of Health & Social Work, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom.
Adam P WagnerNorwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, United Kingdom.
Lisa MinersNorwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, United Kingdom.
Honey-Anne GrecoDepartment of Psychology, Sport and Geography, School of Life and Medical Sciences, College Lane, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom.ORCID 0009-0002-3578-2914
Katherine E BrownDepartment of Psychology, Sport and Geography, School of Life and Medical Sciences, College Lane, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom.
University of Hertfordshire · GBUniversity of East Anglia · GBQueen's University Belfast · GB

Funding

Public Health Intervention Responsive Studies Team NIHR131573Public Health Intervention Responsive Studies Team NIHR134423
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundObesity is a global epidemic affecting all age groups, populations, and income levels across continents, though is known to disproportionately affect socioeconomically disadvantaged populations. The causes of obesity are complex, informed by diet and weight practices, but shaped by social, commercial, and environmental factors and government policy. Consequently, a Whole System Approach (WSA)-which considers the many causes of obesity and shifts the focus away from individuals as points of intervention and puts an emphasis on understanding and improving the system in which people live-is required. This scoping review of reviews aims to: determine how WSAs to diet and healthy weight have been implemented and evaluated nationally and internationally; to determine what models or theories have been used to implement WSAs; describe how WSAs have been evaluated; determine if WSAs are effective; and to identify the contribution of the public and/or service users in the development of WSAs.

methodSystematic searches were carried out using CINAHL, Scopus, PsycINFO (ProQuest), the Cochrane Library, and MEDLINE. Included review papers were those that focused on the application of a whole system approach to diet and/or healthy weight, and/or reported the theory/model used to implement or simulate this approach. Databases were searched from 1995 to March 2022 using a combination of text and Medical Subject Headings (MeSH terms). In addition, reference sections of identified articles were examined for additional relevant articles. Covidence software was used to screen titles and abstracts from the electronic databases and resolve conflicts.

resultsA total of 20,308 articles were initially retrieved; after duplicate removal 7,690 unique title and abstracts were reviewed, and 110 articles were selected for full text review. On completion of full text review, 8 review articles were included for data extraction. These included: one umbrella review, four systematic reviews, a rapid review, and two literature reviews (one of which was on strategic reports written for government and public health policy). Evaluations of WSA were mainly process evaluations although health outcomes were assessed in some studies. Several conceptual frameworks or mathematical modelling approaches have been applied to WSAs for diet, healthy weight, and obesity to inform their planning or delivery, and to understand/map the associated systems. Common mathematical approaches include agent based or System Dynamic Modelling. Underlying both conceptual and mathematical models is an understanding how the elements of the complex systems impact each other to affect diet, healthy weight, and obesity. WSA implementations have reported some success in positively impacting health outcomes including reducing Body Mass Index, reducing sugary food intake, and increasing physical activity. Public and user involvement in WSA was not widely reported.

conclusionThe application of WSA to diet and healthy weight shows promise, yet the research is lagging behind their implementation. Further robust evidence for using WSA to address diet and healthy weight are required, including incorporating process and outcome evaluations (perhaps using established approaches such as Systems Dynamic Modelling). Furthermore, the analysis of epidemiological data alongside longitudinal process and outcome evaluation regarding the implementation of a WSA is required.

Indexed as

Body WeightObesityDietHumansReview Literature as Topic

Identifiers

PMID38478570
PMCPMC10936799
OpenAlexW4392763149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.