ArticlePloS one2024
HaplotagLR: An efficient and configurable utility for haplotagging long reads.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Fiber-TEnCATS reveals haplotype-specific chromatin accessibility and DNA methylation at human L1HS loci.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- A personalized multi-platform assessment of somatic mosaicism in the human frontal cortex.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding the functional effects of sequence variation is crucial in genomics. Individual human genomes contain millions of variants that contribute to phenotypic variability and disease risks at the population level. Because variants rarely act in isolation, we must consider potential interactions of neighboring variants to accurately predict functional effects. We can accomplish this using haplotagging, which matches sequencing reads to their parental haplotypes using alleles observed at known heterozygous variants. However, few published tools for haplotagging exist and these share several technical and usability-related shortcomings that limit applicability, in particular a lack of insight or control over error rates, and lack of key metrics on the underlying sources of haplotagging error. Here we present HaplotagLR: a user-friendly tool that haplotags long sequencing reads based on a multinomial model and existing phased variant lists. HaplotagLR is user-configurable and includes a basic error model to control the empirical FDR in its output. We show that HaplotagLR outperforms the leading haplotagging method in simulated datasets, especially at high levels of specificity, and displays 7% greater sensitivity in haplotagging real data. HaplotagLR advances both the immediate utility of haplotagging and paves the way for further improvements to this important method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.