Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38478426›Full record

ArticleThe ISME journal2024

In vivo evolution of antimicrobial resistance in a biofilm model of Pseudomonas aeruginosa lung infection.

Doaa Higazy, Anh Duc Pham, Coen van Hasselt, Niels Høiby, Lars Jelsbak, Claus Moser, Oana Ciofu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The ISME journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Universal-BacMicrobiologyOpen · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Evolutionary adaptations ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2026
    Article
  8. Biofilm Associated Persistence and Drug Tolerance in Mycobacteria Within Host Microenvironments.APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Mapping the knowledge landscape ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Diversification ofMicroorganisms · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Doaa HigazyCosterton Biofilm Center, Department of Immunology and Microbiology, University of Copenhagen, 2200 N Copenhagen, Denmark.
Anh Duc PhamDivision of Systems Pharmacology & Pharmacy, Leiden Academic Centre for Drug Research, Leiden University, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands.
Coen van HasseltDivision of Systems Pharmacology & Pharmacy, Leiden Academic Centre for Drug Research, Leiden University, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands.
Niels HøibyCosterton Biofilm Center, Department of Immunology and Microbiology, University of Copenhagen, 2200 N Copenhagen, Denmark.
Lars JelsbakDepartment of Biotechnology and Biomedicine, Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.
Claus MoserCosterton Biofilm Center, Department of Immunology and Microbiology, University of Copenhagen, 2200 N Copenhagen, Denmark.
Oana CiofuCosterton Biofilm Center, Department of Immunology and Microbiology, University of Copenhagen, 2200 N Copenhagen, Denmark.
Centre for Human Drug Research · NLRigshospitalet · DKUniversity of Copenhagen · DKTechnical University of Denmark · DK

Funding

Egyptian Ministry of Higher Education
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The evolution of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in biofilms has been repeatedly studied by experimental evolution in vitro, but rarely in vivo. The complex microenvironment at the infection site imposes selective pressures on the bacterial biofilms, potentially influencing the development of AMR. We report here the development of AMR in an in vivo mouse model of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm lung infection. The P. aeruginosa embedded in seaweed alginate beads underwent four successive lung infection passages with or without ciprofloxacin (CIP) exposure. The development of CIP resistance was assessed at each passage by population analysis of the bacterial populations recovered from the lungs of CIP-treated and control mice, with subsequent whole-genome sequencing of selected isolates. As inflammation plays a crucial role in shaping the microenvironment at the infection site, its impact was explored through the measurement of cytokine levels in the lung homogenate. A rapid development of AMR was observed starting from the second passage in the CIP-treated mice. Genetic analysis revealed mutations in nfxB, efflux pumps (mexZ), and two-component systems (parS) contribution to CIP resistance. The control group isolates exhibited mutations in the dipA gene, likely associated with biofilm dispersion. In the initial two passages, the CIP-treated group exhibited an elevated inflammatory response compared to the control group. This increase may potentially contribute to the release of mutagenic reactive oxygen species and the development of AMR. In conclusion, this study illustrates the complex relationship between infection, antibiotic treatment, and immune response.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsPseudomonas InfectionsAnimalsBiofilmsCiprofloxacinDrug Resistance, BacterialLungMiceMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPseudomonas aeruginosaAnti-Bacterial AgentsCiprofloxacinantimicrobial resistancebiofilminflammatory responsein vivo evolutionPseudomonas aeruginosa

Identifiers

PMID38478426
PMCPMC10980832
OpenAlexW4392739194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.