Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38478404›Full record

ArticleThe oncologist2024

Salvage Surgery for Initially Unresectable HCC With PVTT Converted by Locoregional Treatment Plus Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor and Anti-PD-1 Antibody.

Lei Wang, Jin-Kai Feng, Chong-De Lu, Jia-Yi Wu, Bin Zhou, Kang Wang, Xu-Biao Wei, Chao Liang, Hong-Kun Zhou, Jie Shi and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The oncologist, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Lei WangDepartment of Hepatic Surgery VI, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Jin-Kai FengDepartment of Hepatic Surgery VI, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Chong-De LuDepartment of Hepatic Surgery VI, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Jia-Yi WuDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Fujian Provincial Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, People's Republic of China.
Bin ZhouDepartment of Hepatic Surgery VI, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Kang WangDepartment of Hepatic Surgery VI, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Xu-Biao WeiDepartment of Hepatic Surgery VI, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Chao LiangDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Yueyang Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Hong-Kun ZhouDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Hospital of Jiaxing, Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University, Jiaxing, People's Republic of China.
Jie ShiDepartment of Hepatic Surgery VI, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Wei-Xing GuoDepartment of Hepatic Surgery VI, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Wan Yee LauFaculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong SAR, People's Republic of China.
Mao-Lin YanDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Fujian Provincial Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, People's Republic of China.
Shu-Qun ChengDepartment of Hepatic Surgery VI, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0001-6760-7470
Second Military Medical University · CNFujian Medical University · CNChinese University of Hong Kong · HKJiaxing University · CNShanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China 2022YFC2503700, 2022YFC2503705National Natural Science Foundation of China 81730097, 82072618Shanghai Hospital Development Center SHDC2020CR1004A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aimed to compare the survival outcomes of patients with initially unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) who underwent or did not undergo salvage surgery followed by a triple combination conversion treatment consisted of locoregional treatment (LRT), tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), and anti-PD-1 antibodies.

methodsThe data from 93 consecutive patients with initially unresectable HCC and PVTT across 4 medical centers were retrospectively reviewed. They were converted successfully by the triple combination treatment and underwent or did not undergo salvage resection. The baseline characteristics, conversion schemes, conversion treatment-related adverse events (CTRAEs), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) of the salvage surgery and non-surgery groups were compared. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed to identify independent risk factors for OS and PFS. Additionally, subgroup survival analysis was conducted by stratification of degree of tumor response and type of PVTT.

resultsOf the 93 patients, 44 underwent salvage surgery, and 49 did not undergo salvage surgery. The OS and PFS of the salvage surgery and non-surgery groups were not significantly different (P = .370 and .334, respectively). The incidence and severity of CTRAEs of the 2 groups were also comparable. Subgroup analyses revealed that for patients with complete response (CR) or types III-IV PVTT, there was a trend toward better survival in patients who did not undergo salvage surgery. Multivariate analysis showed that baseline α-fetoprotein and best tumor response per mRECIST criteria were independent prognostic factors for OS and PFS.

conclusionsFor patients with initially unresectable HCC and PVTT who were successfully converted by the triple combination therapy, salvage liver resection may not be necessary, especially for the patients with CR or types III-IV PVTT.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularLiver NeoplasmsProtein Kinase InhibitorsSalvage TherapyAdultAgedFemaleHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsMaleMiddle AgedPortal VeinRetrospective StudiesTyrosine Kinase InhibitorsVenous ThrombosisImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsProtein Kinase InhibitorsTyrosine Kinase Inhibitorsanti-PD-1 antibodyconversion therapyhepatocellular carcinomalocoregional treatmentportal vein tumor thrombustyrosine kinase inhibitor

Identifiers

PMID38478404
PMCPMC11299929
OpenAlexW4392739280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.