ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2024
Dual-branch feature fusion S3D V-Net network for lung nodules segmentation.
Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dual-channel grouped cross-dimension attention V-Net for pulmonary nodule segmentation.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Accurate and robust segmentation of cerebral distal small arteries by DVNet with dual contextual path and vascular attention enhancement.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- HEE-SegGAN: A holistically-nested edge enhanced GAN for pulmonary nodule segmentation.PloS one · 2025Article
- Dual-branch feature fusion S3D V-Net network for lung nodules segmentation.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2024Article
- EDTNet: A spatial aware attention-based transformer for the pulmonary nodule segmentation.PloS one · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAccurate segmentation of lung nodules can help doctors get more accurate results and protocols in early lung cancer diagnosis and treatment planning, so that patients can be better detected and treated at an early stage, and the mortality rate of lung cancer can be reduced. PURPOSE: Currently, the improvement of lung nodule segmentation accuracy has been limited by his heterogeneous performance in the lungs, the imbalance between segmentation targets and background pixels, and other factors. We propose a new 2.5D lung nodule segmentation network model for lung nodule segmentation. This network model can well improve the extraction of edge information of lung nodules, and fuses intra-slice and inter-slice features, which makes good use of the three-dimensional structural information of lung nodules and can more effectively improve the accuracy of lung nodule segmentation.
methodsOur approach is based on a typical encoding-decoding network structure for improvement. The improved model captures the features of multiple nodules in both 3-D and 2-D CT images, complements the information of the segmentation target's features and enhances the texture features at the edges of the pulmonary nodules through the dual-branch feature fusion module (DFFM) and the reverse attention context module (RACM), and employs central pooling instead of the maximal pooling operation, which is used to preserve the features around the target and to eliminate the edge-irrelevant features, to further improve the performance of the segmentation of the pulmonary nodules.
resultsWe evaluated this method on a wide range of 1186 nodules from the LUNA16 dataset, and averaging the results of ten cross-validated, the proposed method achieved the mean dice similarity coefficient (mDSC) of 84.57%, the mean overlapping error (mOE) of 18.73% and average processing of a case is about 2.07 s. Moreover, our results were compared with inter-radiologist agreement on the LUNA16 dataset, and the average difference was 0.74%.
conclusionThe experimental results show that our method improves the accuracy of pulmonary nodules segmentation and also takes less time than more 3-D segmentation methods in terms of time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.