Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38478325›Full record

ArticleJournal of bioethical inquiry2024

The Ethics of Stem Cell-Based Embryo-Like Structures : A Focus Group Study on the Perspectives of Dutch Professionals and Lay Citizens.

A M Pereira Daoud, W J Dondorp, A L Bredenoord, G M W R de Wert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bioethical inquiry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

A M Pereira DaoudDepartment of Health, Ethics and Society (HES), the Research School for Oncology and Developmental Biology (GROW), Department of Medical Humanities, Maastricht University, and University Medical Centre Utrecht, P. Debyeplein 1, Maastricht, Limburg, 6229 HA, The Netherlands. a.pereiradaoud@maastrichtuniversity.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-0675-8133
W J DondorpDepartment of Health, Ethics and Society (HES), the Research School for Oncology and Developmental Biology (GROW), Department of Medical Humanities, Maastricht University, and University Medical Centre Utrecht, P. Debyeplein 1, Maastricht, Limburg, 6229 HA, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4052-7192
A L BredenoordErasmus University Rotterdam, School of Philosophy, Burgemeester Oudlaan 50, Rotterdam, South Holland, 3062 PA, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7542-8963
G M W R de WertDepartment of Health, Ethics and Society (HES), the Research School for Oncology and Developmental Biology (GROW), Department of Medical Humanities, Maastricht University, and University Medical Centre Utrecht, P. Debyeplein 1, Maastricht, Limburg, 6229 HA, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0410-4902

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In order to study early human development while avoiding the burdens associated with human embryo research, scientists are redirecting their efforts towards so-called human embryo-like structures (hELS). hELS are created from clusters of human pluripotent stem cells and seem capable of mimicking early human development with increasing accuracy. Notwithstanding, hELS research finds itself at the intersection of historically controversial fields, and the expectation that it might be received as similarly sensitive is prompting proactive law reform in many jurisdictions, including the Netherlands. However, studies on the public perception of hELS research remain scarce. To help guide policymakers and fill this gap in the literature, we conducted an explorative qualitative study aimed at mapping the range of perspectives in the Netherlands on the creation and research use of hELS. This article reports on a subset of our findings, namely those pertaining to (the degrees of and requirements for) confidence in research with hELS and its regulation. Despite commonly found disparities in confidence on emerging biotechnologies, we also found wide consensus regarding the requirements for having (more) confidence in hELS research. We conclude by reflecting on how these findings could be relevant to researchers and (Dutch) policymakers when interpreted within the context of their limitations.

Indexed as

Embryo ResearchFocus GroupsEthics, ResearchHumansNetherlandsPluripotent Stem CellsPublic OpinionQualitative ResearchStem Cell ResearchEthicsFocus group studyHuman embryo-like structuresLay perspectivesPolicyProfessional perspectives

Identifiers

PMID38478325
PMCPMC11652579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.