Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38478259›Full record

ArticleFamilial cancer2024

Cascade screening in HBOC and Lynch syndrome: guidelines and procedures in a UK centre.

D Gareth Evans, Kate Green, George J Burghel, Claire Forde, Fiona Lalloo, Helene Schlecht, Emma R Woodward

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Familial cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

D Gareth EvansManchester Centre for Genomic Medicine and North-West Genomics Hub, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK. gareth.evans@mft.nhs.uk.
Kate GreenManchester Centre for Genomic Medicine and North-West Genomics Hub, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK.
George J BurghelManchester Centre for Genomic Medicine and North-West Genomics Hub, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK.
Claire FordeManchester Centre for Genomic Medicine and North-West Genomics Hub, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK.
Fiona LallooManchester Centre for Genomic Medicine and North-West Genomics Hub, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK.
Helene SchlechtManchester Centre for Genomic Medicine and North-West Genomics Hub, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK.
Emma R WoodwardManchester Centre for Genomic Medicine and North-West Genomics Hub, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK.
Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Manchester Biomedical Research Centre IS-BRC-1215-200074
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the 33 years since the first diagnostic cancer predisposition gene (CPG) tests in the Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, there has been substantial changes in the identification of index cases and cascade testing for at-risk family members. National guidelines in England and Wales are usually determined from the National Institute of healthcare Evidence and these have impacted on the thresholds for testing BRCA1/2 in Hereditary Breast Ovarian Cancer (HBOC) and in determining that all cases of colorectal and endometrial cancer should undergo screening for Lynch syndrome. Gaps for testing other CPGs relevant to HBOC have been filled by the UK Cancer Genetics Group and CanGene-CanVar project (web ref. https://www.cangene-canvaruk.org/ ). We present time trends (1990-2020) of identification of index cases with germline CPG variants and numbers of subsequent cascade tests, for BRCA1, BRCA2, and the Lynch genes (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 and PMS2). For BRCA1/2 there was a definite increase in the proportion of index cases with ovarian cancer only and pre-symptomatic index tests both doubling from 16 to 32% and 3.2 to > 8% respectively. A mean of 1.73-1.74 additional family tests were generated for each BRCA1/2 index case within 2 years. Overall close to one positive cascade test was generated per index case resulting in > 1000 risk reducing surgery operations. In Lynch syndrome slightly more cascade tests were performed in the first two years potentially reflecting the increased actionability in males with 42.2% of pre-symptomatic tests in males compared to 25.8% in BRCA1/2 (p < 0.0001).

Indexed as

Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary NonpolyposisGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetic TestingHereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer SyndromePractice Guidelines as TopicBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinDNA-Binding ProteinsEarly Detection of CancerFemaleGerm-Line MutationHumansMaleMismatch Repair Endonuclease PMS2MutL Protein Homolog 1MutS Homolog 2 ProteinBRCA1 ProteinBRCA1 protein, humanBRCA2 ProteinBRCA2 protein, humanDNA-Binding ProteinsG-T mismatch-binding proteinMismatch Repair Endonuclease PMS2MLH1 protein, humanMSH2 protein, humanMutL Protein Homolog 1MutS Homolog 2 ProteinPMS2 protein, humanBRCA1/2Cancer predisposition gene (CPG)Genetic testingLynch syndrome

Identifiers

PMID38478259
PMCPMC11153258
OpenAlexW4392760905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.