ArticlePharmacological reports : PR2024
Transcriptome analysis of an AKT inhibitor-resistant endometrial cancer cell line.
Article in Pharmacological reports : PR, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Identification of prognostic biomarkers for endometrioid endometrial carcinoma based on the miRNA and mRNA co-expression network regulated by estradiol.Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDrug resistance in endometrial cancer (EC) is a serious problem and a barrier to improving prognosis. The PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway is highly activated in EC and can serve as a potential therapeutic target. Inhibitors against AKT have been developed, but resistance to these inhibitors is a concern. This study aimed to establish AKT inhibitor resistant cell lines and identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between parental and AKT inhibitor resistant cell lines to understand the mechanism of drug resistance to AKT inhibitors in EC.
methodsThe sensitivity of eight EC cell lines to AKT inhibitor was analyzed. One of them was used to establish a drug-resistant cell line. DEGs were examined using RNA sequencing (RNA-seq). Furthermore, DEGs were comprehensively analyzed to identify hub genes. Hub genes were evaluated using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction.
resultsRNA-seq identified 617 DEGs. Hub genes were selected using bioinformatics analysis. The top 10 hub genes were TNF, CDH1, CCND1, COL1A1, CDH2, ICAM1, CAV1, THBS1, NCAM1, and CDKN2A. Relative mRNA expression was significantly upregulated for TNF, CDH1, CCND1, THBS1, p16
conclusionsDrug resistance to AKT inhibitors may depend on genes related to cell adhesion-mediated resistance and transforming growth factor β signaling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.