Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38478196›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2025

Exploring childhood cancer survivor, parent, healthcare and community professionals' experiences of, and priorities for, using digital health to engage in physical activity: a mixed methods study.

Lauren Ha, Suzanne M Nevin, Claire E Wakefield, Jacqueline Jacovou, David Mizrahi, Christina Signorelli

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Lauren HaSchool of Clinical Medicine, Discipline of Paediatrics and Child Health, UNSW Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, Australia. Lauren.ha@unsw.edu.au.
Suzanne M NevinSchool of Clinical Medicine, Discipline of Paediatrics and Child Health, UNSW Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, Australia.
Claire E WakefieldSchool of Clinical Medicine, Discipline of Paediatrics and Child Health, UNSW Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, Australia.
Jacqueline JacovouSchool of Clinical Medicine, Discipline of Paediatrics and Child Health, UNSW Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, Australia.
David MizrahiThe Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, Australia.
Christina SignorelliSchool of Clinical Medicine, Discipline of Paediatrics and Child Health, UNSW Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, Australia.
UNSW Sydney · AUSydney Children's Hospital · AUUniversity of Sydney · AU

Funding

Cancer Institute NSW Early Career Fellowship 2020/ECF1144National Health and Medical Research Council APP2008300
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDigital health interventions provide an innovative way to engage childhood cancer survivors in physical activity, yet few studies have explored the priorities of key stakeholders regarding using digital health. We aimed to investigate survivor, parent, and healthcare and community professional (HCP) experiences, priorities, and perceived importance of using digital health to promote physical activity behaviours for survivors.

methodsParticipants rated the importance of digital health features to promote physical activity in a survey. Guided by survey responses, we facilitated online focus groups or semi-structured interviews to discuss participants' experiences, priorities, and suggestions in-depth. We transcribed the data verbatim and conducted directed content analysis.

resultsForty participants took part in focus groups or interviews (including 9 childhood cancer survivors aged 8-21 years, 13 parents, and 18 HCP). Four key priorities were identified: health behaviour education, peer and parent involvement, goalsetting, and support from an HCP. There was a strong preference for digital mediums to facilitate physical activity due to its accessibility and convenience. Common intervention suggestions included earlier intervention (before the survivorship period), tailored and age-appropriate programs, a combined diet and exercise approach, and concise education delivery.

conclusionsThis study identified key priorities that may help to promote physical activity behaviours among childhood cancer survivors. Further research is needed to integrate these priorities into health behaviour interventions and evaluate their feasibility and efficacy. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Incorporating these multi-perspective priorities into future interventions will help to ensure their sustainability, acceptability, and uptake. This will in turn support childhood cancer survivors to develop a healthy lifestyle into adulthood.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsExerciseHealth PersonnelNeoplasmsParentsAdolescentAdultChildDigital HealthFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleYoung AdultChildhood cancerDigital healthFocus groupInterventionPhysical activitySurvivorship

Identifiers

PMID38478196
PMCPMC12283819
OpenAlexW4392744445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.