ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2024
Comparative analysis of robotic single-site cholecystectomy outcomes between novice and expert surgeons.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Single-surgeon training of 14 novice surgeons in robotic cholecystectomy: a study of 300 consecutive cases, assessing training outcomes and surgical performance.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Mapping the learning curve of robotic cholecystectomy: a multi‑surgeon cohort analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Comparative Analysis of Learning Curves in Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Systematic Review.Cureus · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) has declined in popularity, posing a challenge for novice surgeons. However, robotic single-site cholecystectomy (RSSC) has gained popularity in hepatopancreatic surgery, suggesting a paradigm shift in minimally invasive procedures due to the advantages of robotic platforms. The purpose of this study was to compare the surgical outcomes and learning curves between experts and novices without SILC experience, and discuss the utility and potential of RSSC for novice surgeons. A total of 235 patients underwent RSSC between April 2019 and June 2023 at the OOO University Hospital. Among them, 31 cases from novice and expert surgeons were selected to compare their initial experience. Comprehensive demographic and perioperative factors were analyzed and statistical comparisons were made, including cumulative sum analysis (CUSUM) for learning curves. The demographic factors showed no statistically significant differences between the two groups. Although the docking time (P < 0.001) and hospital stay (P = 0.014) were statistically significant, the total operative time and other perioperative factors were comparable. Novice surgeons demonstrated a shorter absolute total operative time, primarily attributed to differences in docking time. The CUSUM analysis indicated a shorter learning curve for novice surgeons. This study shows that the inherent benefits of the robotic platform make it an accessible and reproducible technique for novices. The benefits of integrating observational learning into robotic surgery training programs and the intrinsic advantages of the robotic platform in minimizing the learning curve for RSSC were also highlighted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38478186What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.