Observational studyIrish journal of medical science2024
Examining the approach to medical remediation programmes-an observational study.
Observational study in Irish journal of medical science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRemediation of underperforming students is recognised as an important tool in medical education; however, there is no universally agreed approach.
aimsThis study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a remediation program for final year medical students who failed their first long case assessment (LCA1) and to compare their academic performance with their peers who passed their first long case assessment.
methodsThe study consisted of two phases. Phase 1 analysed the demographics and academic performance data for the 9% of the class in the remediation group. Phase 2 focused on collecting similar data for the remaining 91% of students in the non-remediation group. Statistical analyses including the Wilcoxon rank sum test and Pearson correlation coefficients were used to compare the groups.
resultsPhase 1 showed 88% of students who participated in remediation successfully passed the second long case assessment (LCA2); however, 25% of this cohort ultimately failed the academic year due to poor results in other assessments. Phase 2 results revealed that non-remediation group students scored significantly higher in LCA2 (59.71% vs 52.07%, p < 0.001) compared to their remediation counterparts, despite 19% of them failing this assessment. Non-remediation group students consistently outperformed their remediation group counterparts in formative and summative assessments. Overall, 6.25% of the entire class failed the academic year.
conclusionThis study demonstrates the need to focus on overall academic performance to identify struggling students rather than one high stakes exam. Most of the students in the remediation programme ultimately passed LCA2.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.