Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38478156›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience2025

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on perceptions of social relationships, negative affect, and paranoid ideation.

Ryan D Orth, Christina L G Savage, Melanie E Bennett, Jack J Blanchard

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ryan D OrthDepartment of Psychology, University of Maryland, 4094 Campus Dr, College Park, MD, 20742, USA. rorth@umd.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7611-5806
Christina L G SavageDepartment of Psychology, University of Maryland, 4094 Campus Dr, College Park, MD, 20742, USA.
Melanie E BennettDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Jack J BlanchardDepartment of Psychology, University of Maryland, 4094 Campus Dr, College Park, MD, 20742, USA.

Funding

Understanding Social Affiliative Deficits in PsychopathologyR01MH110462 · NIMH · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI BLANCHARD, JACK J. · 2016 to 2019
$2.3M
National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences R01-MH110462
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic contributed to worsening mental health across the globe. The pandemic may have been especially impactful on those experiencing heightened psychosis spectrum symptomatology given greater pre-pandemic social isolation and increased vulnerability to stress. Yet, few studies exploring the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on perceptions of social relationships and mental health have sampled individuals high in psychosis spectrum symptomatology, including those with psychosis spectrum disorders. Utilizing a mixed transdiagnostic community sample enriched for psychotic spectrum disorders, this longitudinal study investigated whether perceptions of social relationships and psychiatric symptoms changed during the COVID-19 pandemic, whether pandemic-related impacts were associated with social perceptions and symptomatology, and whether paranoid ideation was related to perceptions of the government response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Pandemic impacts were not uniform, with participants reporting a range of adverse impacts including poorer health-related behaviors, difficulties fulfilling basic needs, and medical related challenges. Results indicated that compared to pre-pandemic assessments, perceived rejection and hostility increased during the COVID-19 pandemic. Participants who experienced more pandemic-related impacts reported less social support, more social distress, greater negative affect, and greater paranoid ideation. Paranoid ideation was related to more negative perceptions of the government's response to the pandemic. These findings demonstrate the importance of assessing individual differences in pandemic-related impacts and the clinical consequences of such impacts. Results also suggest that those high in paranoid ideation may be reluctant to engage in government recommended protective health behaviors to limit the spread of COVID-19.

Indexed as

AffectCOVID-19Paranoid DisordersPsychotic DisordersSocial PerceptionAdultFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedSocial SupportYoung AdultAnxietyCoronavirusDepressionParanoiaPsychosisSocial perception

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.