ArticleHuman genetics2024
PdmIRD: missense variants pathogenicity prediction for inherited retinal diseases in a disease-specific manner.
Article in Human genetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Benchmarking AlphaMissense against ClinVar for Diagnostic Interpretation of Missense Variants in Inherited Retinal Diseases.Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
- Harnessing artificial intelligence for genomic variant prediction: advances, challenges, and future directions.GigaScience · 2026Review
- CTpredX: Enhancing missense variant pathogenicity prediction in childhood cancer predisposition genes.Genes & diseases · 2026Article
- PRP: pathogenic risk prediction for rare nonsynonymous single nucleotide variants.Human genetics · 2025Article
- Single-cell RNA sequencing highlights a significant retinal Müller glial population in dry age-related macular degeneration.iScience · 2025Article
- A graph neural network approach for accurate prediction of pathogenicity in multi-type variants.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate discrimination of pathogenic and nonpathogenic variation remains an enormous challenge in clinical genetic testing of inherited retinal diseases (IRDs) patients. Computational methods for predicting variant pathogenicity are the main solutions for this dilemma. The majority of the state-of-the-art variant pathogenicity prediction tools disregard the differences in characteristics among different genes and treat all types of mutations equally. Since missense variants are the most common type of variation in the coding region of the human genome, we developed a novel missense mutation pathogenicity prediction tool, named Prediction of Deleterious Missense Mutation for IRDs (PdmIRD) in this study. PdmIRD was tailored for IRDs-related genes and constructed with the conditional random forest model. Population frequencies and a newly available prediction tool were incorporated into PdmIRD to improve the performance of the model. The evaluation of PdmIRD demonstrated its superior performance over nonspecific tools (areas under the curves, 0.984 and 0.910) and an existing eye abnormalities-specific tool (areas under the curves, 0.975 and 0.891). We also demonstrated the submodel that used a smaller gene panel further slightly improved performance. Our study provides evidence that a disease-specific model can enhance the prediction of missense mutation pathogenicity, especially when new and important features are considered. Additionally, this study provides guidance for exploring the characteristics and functions of the mutated proteins in a greater number of Mendelian disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.