Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38478125›Full record

ArticleMikrochimica acta2024

Metal oxide-based gas sensor array for VOCs determination in complex mixtures using machine learning.

Shivam Singh, Sajana S, Poornima Varma, Gajje Sreelekha, Chandranath Adak, Rajendra P Shukla, Vinayak B Kamble

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Mikrochimica acta, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
12.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Shivam SinghSchool of Physics, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, 695551, India.
Sajana SSchool of Physics, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, 695551, India.
Poornima VarmaDept. of CSE, Indian Institute of Information Technology, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, 226002, India.
Gajje SreelekhaDept. of CSE, Indian Institute of Technology, Patna, Bihar, 801106, India.
Chandranath AdakDept. of CSE, Indian Institute of Technology, Patna, Bihar, 801106, India. chandranath@iitp.ac.in.
Rajendra P ShuklaBIOS Lab-On-a-Chip Group, MESA+ Institute for Nanotechnology, Max Planck Center for Complex Fluid Dynamics, University of Twente, P.O. Box 217, 7500, Enschede, The Netherlands. r.p.shukla@utwente.nl.
Vinayak B KambleSchool of Physics, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, 695551, India. kbvinayak@iisertvm.ac.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6344-2194
Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Thiruvananthapuram · INIndian Institute of Technology Patna · INIndian Institute of Information Technology Allahabad · INMax Planck University of Twente Center for Complex Fluid Dynamics · NL

Funding

Science and Engineering Research Board CRG/2022/006973
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Detection of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from the breath is becoming a viable route for the early detection of diseases non-invasively. This paper presents a sensor array of 3 component metal oxides that give maximal cross-sensitivity and can successfully use machine learning methods to identify four distinct VOCs in a mixture. The metal oxide sensor array comprises NiO-Au (ohmic), CuO-Au (Schottky), and ZnO-Au (Schottky) sensors made by the DC reactive sputtering method and having a film thickness of 80-100 nm. The NiO and CuO films have ultrafine particle sizes of < 50 nm and rough surface texture, while ZnO films consist of nanoscale platelets. This array was subjected to various VOC concentrations, including ethanol, acetone, toluene, and chloroform, one by one and in a pair/mix of gases. Thus, the response values show severe interference and departure from commonly observed power law behavior. The dataset obtained from individual gases and their mixtures were analyzed using multiple machine learning algorithms, such as Random Forest (RF), K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), Decision Tree, Linear Regression, Logistic Regression, Naive Bayes, Linear Discriminant Analysis, Artificial Neural Network, and Support Vector Machine. KNN and RF have shown more than 99% accuracy in classifying different varying chemicals in the gas mixtures. In regression analysis, KNN has delivered the best results with an R

Indexed as

Complex mixtureGas sensorMachine learningMetal oxidesSensor arrayVOCs

Identifiers

PMID38478125
PMCPMC10937778
OpenAlexW4392747729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.