Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38478095›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of urology2024

Surgical procedure and recurrence of upper urinary tract stone: a national-wide study based on hospitalized patients.

Qin Wang, Yu Wang, Chao Yang, Jinwei Wang, Xiao-Chun Zhang, Luxia Zhang, Ming-Hui Zhao

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Risk Factors for Upper Urinary Tract Stone Recurrence: A Retrospective Study of 247 Patients.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Qin WangRenal Division, Department of Medicine, Institute of Nephrology, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, 8 Xishiku Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China.
Yu WangRenal Division, Department of Medicine, Institute of Nephrology, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, 8 Xishiku Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China. ddwangyu@sina.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8826-7911
Chao YangRenal Division, Department of Medicine, Institute of Nephrology, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, 8 Xishiku Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China.
Jinwei WangRenal Division, Department of Medicine, Institute of Nephrology, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, 8 Xishiku Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China.
Xiao-Chun ZhangDepartment of Urology, Institute of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, National Urological Cancer Center, Peking University, 8 Xishiku Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China. Xiaochun6114@sina.com.
Luxia ZhangRenal Division, Department of Medicine, Institute of Nephrology, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, 8 Xishiku Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China.
Ming-Hui ZhaoRenal Division, Department of Medicine, Institute of Nephrology, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, 8 Xishiku Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China.
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNCentral South University · CNPeking University · CN

Funding

CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences 2019-I2M-5-046China-World Health Organization Biennial Collaborative Projects 2019/892000-0Chinese Scientific and Technical Innovation Project 2030 2018AAA0102100National Key R&D Program of the Ministry of Science and Technology of China 2019YFC2005000National Natural Science Foundation of China 72125009National Natural Science Foundation of China 81770671National Natural Science Foundation of China 82003529National Natural Science Foundation of China 82090021National Natural Science Foundation of China 82200776PKU-Baidu Fund 2020BD004PKU-Baidu Fund 2020BD005PKU-Baidu Fund 2020BD032University of Michigan Health System-Peking University Health Science Center Joint Institute for Translational and Clinical Research BMU2018JI012University of Michigan Health System-Peking University Health Science Center Joint Institute for Translational and Clinical Research BMU2019JI005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to investigate the influence of surgical intervention on recurrence risk of upper urinary tract stone and compare the medical burden of various surgical procedures.

methodsThis study analyzed data from patients with upper urinary tract stone extracted from a national database of hospitalized patients in China, from January 2013 to December 2018. Surgical recurrence was defined as patients experience surgical procedures for upper urinary tract stone again with a time interval over 90 days. Associations of surgical procedures with surgical recurrence were evaluated by Cox regression.

resultsIn total, 556,217 patients with upper urinary tract stone were included in the present analysis. The mean age of the population was 49.9 ± 13.1 years and 64.1% were men. During a median follow-up of 2.7 years (IQR 1.5-4.0 years), 23,012 patients (4.1%) had surgical recurrence with an incidence rate of 14.9 per 1000 person-years. Compared to patients receiving open surgery, ESWL (HR, 1.59; 95% CI 1.49-1.70), URS (HR, 1.38; 95% CI 1.31-1.45), and PCNL (HR, 1.11; 95% CI 1.06-1.18) showed a greater risk for surgical recurrence. Patients receiving ESWL had the shortest hospital stay length and the lowest cost among the 4 procedures.

conclusionsCompared with open surgery, ESWL, URS, and PCNL are associated with higher risks of surgical recurrence for upper urinary tract stone, while ESWL showed the least medical burden including both expenditure and hospital stay length. How to keep balance of intervention efficacy and medical expenditure is an important issue to be weighed cautiously in clinic practice and studied more in the future.

Indexed as

Kidney CalculiLithotripsyNephrostomy, PercutaneousUrinary CalculiUrinary TractAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRecurrenceSurgical procedureTreatmentUpper urinary tract stone

Identifiers

PMID38478095
OpenAlexW4392747748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.