ArticleWorld journal of urology2024
Accurate prediction of pure uric acid urinary stones in clinical context via a combination of radiomics and machine learning.
Article in World journal of urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Investigation and quantification of composition variability in urinary stone analysis.Investigative and clinical urology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
purposeOral chemolysis is an effective and non-invasive treatment for uric acid urinary stones. This study aimed to classify urinary stones into either pure uric acid (pUA) or other composition (Others) using non-contrast-enhanced computed tomography scans (NCCTs).
methodsInstances managed at our institution from 2019 to 2021 were screened. They were labeled as either pUA or Others based upon composition analyses, and randomly split into training or testing data set. Several instances contained multiple NCCTs which were all collected. In each of NCCTs, individual urinary stone was treated as individual sample. From manually drawn volumes of interest, we extracted original and wavelet radiomics features for each sample. The most important features were then selected via the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator for building the final model on a Support Vector Machine. Performance on the testing set was evaluated via accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC).
resultsThere were 302 instances, of which 118 had pUA urinary stones, generating 576 samples in total. From 851 original and wavelet radiomics features extracted for each sample, 10 most important features were ultimately selected. On the testing data set, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and AUPRC were 93.9%, 97.9%, 92.2%, and 0.958, respectively, for per-sample prediction, and 90.8%, 100%, 87.5%, and 0.902, respectively, for per-instance prediction.
conclusionThe machine learning algorithm trained with radiomics features from NCCTs can accurately predict pUA urinary stones. Our work suggests a potential assisting tool for stone disease treatment selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.