ArticlePediatric cardiology2025
Morphology, Clinical Associations, and Pathologic Follow-up of Quadricuspid Aortic Valves in Children.
Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While quadricuspid morphology is commonly observed in truncal valves, quadricuspid aortic valves (QAV) are rare and their natural history is not well described. This retrospective study of 37 patients describes the diagnostic associations and morphologic variability of QAVs in children (median age at diagnosis 4.3 y IQR 0-12 y). Associated congenital heart diseases were present in 54% (most commonly tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) and valvar pulmonary stenosis). Among patients with isolated QAV, 11 had genetic syndrome and 5 had skeletal anomalies. Valve morphology was most commonly type B (41%) and A (35%; Hurvitz and Roberts). Dilated aortic root (Z ≥ 2) was present in 5 and dilated ascending aorta in 9 patients at diagnosis. All patients with type C (n = 3) and G (n = 1) had aortic dilation. At diagnosis, >mild AR was rare (n = 1), mild regurgitation was common (n = 12, 32%), >mild AS was rare (n = 2), and mild AS was uncommon (n = 4). Over a median follow-up of 3.3y (IQR 0.9-11y), progression of AR was seen in 2 patients and progression of aortic root or ascending aorta dilation (increase in Z score by ≥ 2) was seen in 5 patients. In conclusion, QAV is a rare congenital anomaly and about half of the cases are found in hearts that are otherwise structurally normal. A relatively high prevalence is seen in patients with TOF, pulmonary stenosis, skeletal deformities, and genetic syndromes. Meticulous evaluation of aortic valve morphology should be conducted on echocardiograms performed for these indications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.