ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2024
Long-Term Porcine Retina Explants as an Alternative to In Vivo Experimentation.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Protocol for culturing porcine retinal explants and RNA isolation.STAR protocols · 2026Article
- Transcriptomic Analysis of Organotypic Porcine Retina Cultures.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Understanding the strengths and limitations of recombinant protein studies.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2026Review
- Magnetic-Guided Delivery of Antisense Oligonucleotides for Targeted Transduction in Multiple Retinal Explant and Organoid Models.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The porcine retina represents an optimal model system to study treatment approaches for inherited retinal dystrophies owing to close anatomical similarities to the human retina, including a cone enriched visual streak. The aim of this work was to establish a protocol to keep explants in culture for up to 28 days with good morphological preservation. Methods: Two to four retina explants per eye were obtained from the central part of the retina and transferred onto a membrane insert with the photoreceptors facing down. Different medium compositions using Neurobasal-A medium containing 100 or 450 mg/dL glucose and combinations of fetal calf serum, B-27 with or without insulin and N-2 were tested. We developed a tissue quality score with robust markers for different retinal cell types (protein kinase C alpha, peanut agglutinin and 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindol). Results: Retinae were kept until 28 days with only little degradation. The best results were attained using Neurobasal-A medium containing 100 mg/dL glucose supplemented with B-27 containing insulin and N-2. For an easy preparation process, it is necessary to minimize transport time and keep the eyes on ice until dissected. Heat-mediated decontamination by the butcher has to be avoided. Conclusions: Using a standardized protocol, porcine retina explants represent an easy to handle intermediate model between in vitro and in vivo experimentation. This model system is robustly reproducible and contributes to the implementation of the 3R principle to minimize animal experimentation. Translational Relevance: This model can be used to test future therapeutic approaches for inherited retinal dystrophies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.