Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38477893›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of physiology2024

Circadian patterns of behaviour change during pregnancy in mice.

Georgia S Clarke, Andrew D Vincent, Sharon R Ladyman, Kathryn L Gatford, Amanda J Page

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of physiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Georgia S ClarkeSchool of Biomedicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3303-6512
Andrew D VincentFreemasons Centre for Male Health & Wellbeing, Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Sharon R LadymanCentre for Neuroendocrinology, School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Kathryn L GatfordSchool of Biomedicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2823-3004
Amanda J PageSchool of Biomedicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7086-5865
South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute · AUDunedin Public Hospital · NZFreemasons Foundation Centre for Men's Health · AU

Funding

Honours Scholarship, Robinson Research Institute, University of AdelaideThe Australian Government Research Training Program (RTP) Stipend Scholarship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Food intake and activity adapt during pregnancy to meet the increased energy demands. In comparison to non-pregnant females, pregnant mice consume more food, eating larger meals during the light phase, and reduce physical activity. How pregnancy changes the circadian timing of behaviour was less clear. We therefore randomised female C57BL/6J mice to mating for study until early (n = 10), mid- (n = 10) or late pregnancy (n = 11) or as age-matched, non-pregnant controls (n = 12). Mice were housed individually in Promethion cages with a 12 h light-12 h dark cycle [lights on at 07.00 h, Zeitgeber (ZT)0] for behavioural analysis. Food intake between ZT10 and ZT11 was greater in pregnant than non-pregnant mice on days 6.5-12.5 and 12.5-17.5. In mice that exhibited a peak in the last 4 h of the light phase (ZT8-ZT12), peaks were delayed by 1.6 h in the pregnant compared with the non-pregnant group. Food intake immediately after dark-phase onset (ZT13-ZT14) was greater in the pregnant than non-pregnant group during days 12.5-17.5. Water intake patterns corresponded to food intake. From days 0.5-6.5 onwards, the pregnant group moved less during the dark phase, with decreased probability of being awake, in comparison to the non-pregnant group. The onset of dark-phase activity, peaks in activity, and wakefulness were all delayed during pregnancy. In conclusion, increased food intake during pregnancy reflects increased amplitude of eating behaviour, without longer duration. Decreases in activity also contribute to positive energy balance in pregnancy, with delays to all measured behaviours evident from mid-pregnancy onwards. KEY POINTS: Circadian rhythms synchronise daily behaviours including eating, drinking and sleep, but how these change in pregnancy is unclear. Food intake increased, with delays in peaks of food intake behaviour late in the light phase from days 6.5 to 12.5 of pregnancy, in comparison to the non-pregnant group. The onset of activity after lights off (dark phase) was delayed in pregnant compared with non-pregnant mice. Activity decreased by ∼70% in the pregnant group, particularly in the dark (active) phase, with delays in peaks of wakefulness evident from days 0.5-6.5 of pregnancy onwards. These behavioural changes contribute to positive energy balance during pregnancy. Delays in circadian behaviours during mouse pregnancy were time period and pregnancy stage specific, implying different regulatory mechanisms.

Indexed as

Circadian RhythmEatingMice, Inbred C57BLAnimalsBehavior, AnimalDrinkingFeeding BehaviorFemaleMiceMotor ActivityPhotoperiodPregnancycircadianfood intakephysical activitypregnancy

Identifiers

PMID38477893
PMCPMC11607885
OpenAlexW4392762373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.