Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38477751›Full record

Trial reportJournal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research2024

Equivalence trial of proposed denosumab biosimilar GP2411 and reference denosumab in postmenopausal osteoporosis: the ROSALIA study.

Sławomir Jeka, Eva Dokoupilová, Alan Kivitz, Paweł Żuchowski, Barbara Vogg, Natalia Krivtsova, Susmit Sekhar, Samik Banerjee, Arnd Schwebig, Johann Poetzl and 2 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IClinical Trial, Phase IIComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Body weight predicts denosumab pharmacodynamic duration: a real-world longitudinal cohort study.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Article
  6. Comparative efficacy of biosimilar denosumab and reference denosumab in treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 6 countries.

Sławomir JekaClinic and Department of Rheumatology and Systemic Diseases of Connective Tissue, University Hospital No. 2. Bydgoszcz, CM UMK, 85-168 Bydgoszcz, KP, Poland.
Eva DokoupilováMedical Plus, s.r.o., 68601 Uherske Hradiste, ZL, Czech Republic.
Alan KivitzAltoona Center for Clinical Research, Duncansville, PA 16635, United States.
Paweł ŻuchowskiClinic and Department of Rheumatology and Systemic Diseases of Connective Tissue, University Hospital No. 2. Bydgoszcz, CM UMK, 85-168 Bydgoszcz, KP, Poland.
Barbara VoggClinical Development Biopharmaceuticals, Hexal AG, 83607 Holzkirchen, BY, Germany.
Natalia KrivtsovaClinical Development Biopharmaceuticals, Hexal AG, 83607 Holzkirchen, BY, Germany.
Susmit SekharClinical Development Biopharmaceuticals, Hexal AG, 83607 Holzkirchen, BY, Germany.
Samik BanerjeeClinical Development Biopharmaceuticals, Hexal AG, 83607 Holzkirchen, BY, Germany.
Arnd SchwebigClinical Development Biopharmaceuticals, Hexal AG, 83607 Holzkirchen, BY, Germany.
Johann PoetzlClinical Development Biopharmaceuticals, Hexal AG, 83607 Holzkirchen, BY, Germany.
Jean-Jacques BodyDepartment of Medicine, University Hospital Brugmann, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 1020 Brussels, BE, Belgium.
Richard EastellDivision of Clinical Medicine, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, SYK, United Kingdom.
Hexal (Germany) · DEUniversity of Bydgoszcz · PLAltoona Center for Clinical Research · USMedical Plus · CZUniversité Libre de Bruxelles · BEUniversity of Sheffield · GB

Funding

Hexal AG
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Denosumab is a monoclonal antibody used to reduce risk of fractures in osteoporosis. ROSALIA was a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, integrated phase I/phase III study comparing the efficacy, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), immunogenicity, and safety of proposed biosimilar denosumab GP2411 with reference denosumab (REF-DMAb) (Prolia®; Amgen). Postmenopausal women with osteoporosis were randomized 1:1 to 2 60-mg doses of GP2411 or REF-DMAb, one at study start and one at week 26. At week 52, the REF-DMAb group was re-randomized 1:1 to a third dose of REF-DMAb or switch to GP2411. The primary efficacy endpoint was percentage change from baseline (%CfB) in LS-BMD at week 52. Secondary efficacy endpoints were %CfB in LS-BMD, FN-BMD, and TH-BMD at weeks 26 and 78 (and week 52 for FN-BMD and TH-BMD). Primary PK and PD endpoints were the area under the serum concentration-time curve extrapolated to infinity and maximum drug serum concentration at week 26, and the area under the effect-time curve of the %CfB in serum CTX at week 26. Secondary PK and PD endpoints included drug serum concentrations and %CfB in serum CTX and P1NP during the study period. Similar efficacy was demonstrated at week 52, with 95% CIs of the difference in %CfB in LS-BMD between treatment groups fully contained within prespecified equivalence margins. Similarity in PK and PD was demonstrated at week 26. Immunogenicity was similar between groups and was not impacted by treatment switch. The rate of new vertebral fractures was comparable. Treatment-emergent adverse events were comparable between groups (63.6% [GP2411/GP2411]; 76.0% [REF-DMAb/REF-DMAb]; 76.6% [REF-DMAb/GP2411]). In conclusion, ROSALIA showed similar efficacy, PK and PD, and comparable safety and immunogenicity of GP2411 to REF-DMAb in postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Indexed as

Biosimilar PharmaceuticalsBone Density Conservation AgentsOsteoporosisOsteoporosis, PostmenopausalBone DensityDenosumabDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansBiosimilar PharmaceuticalsBone Density Conservation AgentsDenosumabbone modeling and remodeling: biochemical markers of bone turnoverclinical trialsdiseases and disorders of/related to bone: osteoporosis

Identifiers

PMID38477751
PMCPMC11338045
OpenAlexW4391316533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.