Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38477716›Full record

ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry letters2024

Why Are Left-Handed G-Quadruplexes Scarce?

Michał Jurkowski, Mateusz Kogut, Subrahmanyam Sappati, Jacek Czub

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of physical chemistry letters, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michał JurkowskiDepartment of Physical Chemistry, Gdańsk University of Technology, Narutowicza Street 11/12, 80-233 Gdańsk, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-6369-3527
Mateusz KogutDepartment of Physical Chemistry, Gdańsk University of Technology, Narutowicza Street 11/12, 80-233 Gdańsk, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-1534-0863
Subrahmanyam SappatiDepartment of Physical Chemistry, Gdańsk University of Technology, Narutowicza Street 11/12, 80-233 Gdańsk, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-9065-2253
Jacek CzubDepartment of Physical Chemistry, Gdańsk University of Technology, Narutowicza Street 11/12, 80-233 Gdańsk, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-3639-6935
Gdańsk University of Technology · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

G-quadruplexes (G4s) are nucleic acid structures crucial for the regulation of gene expression and genome maintenance. While they hold promise as nanodevice components, achieving desired G4 folds requires understanding the interplay between stability and structural properties, like helicity. Although right-handed G4 structures dominate the experimental data, the molecular basis for this preference over left-handed helicity is unclear. To address this, we employ all-atom molecular dynamics simulations and quantum chemical methods. Our results reveal that right-handed G4s exhibit greater thermodynamic and kinetic stability as a result of favorable sugar-phosphate backbone conformations in guanine tracts. Moreover, while hydrogen-bonding patterns influence helicity-specific G4 loop conformations, they minimally affect stability differences. We also elucidate the strong correlation between helicity and the strand progression direction, essential for G4 structures. These findings deepen our understanding of G4s, providing molecular-level insights into their structural and energetic preferences, which could inform the design of novel nanodevices.

Indexed as

G-QuadruplexesNucleic AcidsMolecular Dynamics SimulationThermodynamicsNucleic Acids

Identifiers

PMID38477716
PMCPMC10961827
OpenAlexW4392762046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.