Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38477681›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association2024

Spinal Cord Stimulation for Poststroke Hemiparesis: A Scoping Review.

Jonathan R Allen, Swathi R Karri, Chen Yang, Mary Ellen Stoykov

Open access · bronzeAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effects of transcutaneous spinal stimulation with gait training on walking-related outcomes in stroke survivors: a systematic review.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jonathan R AllenJonathan R. Allen, OTD, OTR/L, is Occupational Therapist, Corewell Health, Grand Rapids, MI. At the time of the study, Allen was Doctoral Student, Department of Occupational Therapy, College of Health Sciences, University of Michigan-Flint; allenjon05@gmail.com.
Swathi R KarriSwathi R. Karri, is Osteopathic Medical Student II, Chicago College of Osteopathic Medicine, Midwestern University, Downers Grove, IL.
Chen YangChen Yang, PhD, is Postdoctoral Fellow, Max Näder Lab for Rehabilitation Technologies and Outcomes Research, Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL, and Postdoctoral Fellow, Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL.
Mary Ellen StoykovMary Ellen Stoykov, PhD, OTR/L, is Research Scientist, Arms + Hands Lab, Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL, and Research Associate Professor, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL.
University of Michigan–Flint · US

Funding

Techniques DevelopmentP2CHD086844 · NICHD · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI KAUTZ, STEVEN A. · 2015 to 2024
$12.7M
Bilateral Priming Plus Task Specific Training for Severe Upper Limb HemiparesisR01HD091492 · NICHD · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI CORCOS, DANIEL M. · 2017 to 2021
$1.5M
NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD086844NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD091492
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceSpinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a neuromodulation technique that can improve paresis in individuals with spinal cord injury. SCS is emerging as a technique that can address upper and lower limb hemiparesis. Little is understood about its effectiveness with the poststroke population.

objectiveTo summarize the evidence for SCS after stroke and any changes in upper extremity and lower extremity motor function. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and CINAHL. The reviewers used hand searches and reference searches of retrieved articles. There were no limitations regarding publication year. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA COLLECTION: This review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist. The inclusion and exclusion criteria included a broad range of study characteristics. Studies were excluded if the intervention did not meet the definition of SCS intervention, used only animals or healthy participants, did not address upper or lower limb motor function, or examined neurological conditions other than stroke.

findingsFourteen articles met the criteria for this review. Seven studies found a significant improvement in motor function in groups receiving SCS. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Results indicate that SCS may provide an alternative means to improve motor function in the poststroke population. Plain-Language Summary: The results of this study show that spinal cord stimulation may provide an alternative way to improve motor function after stroke. Previous neuromodulation methods have targeted the impaired supraspinal circuitry after stroke. Although downregulated, spinal cord circuitry is largely intact and offers new possibilities for motor recovery.

Indexed as

ParesisSpinal Cord StimulationStrokeStroke RehabilitationHumansLower ExtremityRecovery of FunctionUpper Extremity

Identifiers

PMID38477681
PMCPMC11017736
OpenAlexW4392740867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.