Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38477668›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science2024

Effects of a novel dental chew on oral health outcomes, halitosis, and microbiota of adult dogs.

Patricia M Oba, Kelly M Sieja, Amy Schauwecker, Amy J Somrak, Teodora S Hristova, Stephanie C J Keating, Kelly S Swanson

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A Novel Postbiotic Reduces Canine Halitosis.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Patricia M ObaDepartment of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2473-1791
Kelly M SiejaDepartment of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
Amy SchauweckerPetSmart Proprietary Brand Product Development, Phoenix, AZ 85080, USA.
Amy J SomrakDepartment of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
Teodora S HristovaCollege of Veterinary Medicine, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
Stephanie C J KeatingCollege of Veterinary Medicine, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
Kelly S SwansonDepartment of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5518-3076
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · USWalmart (United States) · US

Funding

City of Phoenix
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Halitosis in dogs is an initial indication of periodontitis, highlighting its significance as a vital marker for underlying problems. Moreover, the oral microbial population has a significant influence on periodontal disease. Measuring the oral microbiota may be used in addition to breath odor, dental plaque, and gingivitis scoring to assess the impact of dental chews on oral health. In this study, we aimed to determine the differences in breath odor, oral health outcomes, and oral microbiota of adult dogs consuming a novel dental chew compared with control dogs consuming only a diet. Twelve healthy adult female beagle dogs were used in a crossover design study. Treatments (n = 12/group) included: diet only (control) or the diet + a novel dental chew. Each day, one chew was provided 4 h after mealtime. On days 1, 7, 14, 21, and 27, breath samples were analyzed for total volatile sulfur compound concentrations using a halimeter. On day 0 of each period, teeth were cleaned by a veterinary dentist blinded to treatments. Teeth were scored for plaque, calculus, and gingivitis by the same veterinary dentist on day 28 of each period. After scoring, subgingival and supragingival plaque samples were collected for microbiota analysis using Illumina MiSeq. All data were analyzed using SAS (version 9.4) using the Mixed Models procedure, with P < 0.05 being significant. Overall, the dental chews were well accepted. Dogs consuming the dental chews had lower calculus coverage, thickness, and scores, lower gingivitis scores, and less pocket bleeding than control dogs. Breath volatile sulfur compounds were lower in dogs consuming the dental chews. Bacterial alpha-diversity analysis demonstrated that control dogs had higher bacterial richness than dogs fed dental chews. Bacterial beta-diversity analysis demonstrated that samples clustered based on treatment. In subgingival and supragingival plaque, control dogs had higher relative abundances of potentially pathogenic bacteria (Pelistega, Desulfovibrio, Desulfomicrobium, Fretibacterium, Helcococcus, and Treponema) and lower relative abundances of genera associated with oral health (Neisseria, Actinomyces, and Corynebacterium). Our results suggest that the dental chew tested in this study may aid in reducing periodontal disease risk in dogs by beneficially shifting the microbiota population and inhabiting plaque buildup.

Indexed as

CalculiDog DiseasesGingivitisHalitosisMicrobiotaPeriodontal DiseasesAnimalsBacteriaDogsFemaleOutcome Assessment, Health CareSulfur CompoundsSulfur Compoundscanine healthperiodontal diseasepet foodpet treats

Identifiers

PMID38477668
PMCPMC10981081
OpenAlexW4392736977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.